Stress & executive functioning: A review considering moderating factors

[Display omitted] •Inconsistencies in the association between stress and cognition are outlined.•Analysis of neuroendocrine stress research and its relevance for cognition.•Moderators in the association between stress and cognition are analyzed.•Moderators include experimental and task-specific fact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurobiology of learning and memory 2020-09, Vol.173, p.107254-107254, Article 107254
Hauptverfasser: Plieger, Thomas, Reuter, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 107254
container_issue
container_start_page 107254
container_title Neurobiology of learning and memory
container_volume 173
creator Plieger, Thomas
Reuter, Martin
description [Display omitted] •Inconsistencies in the association between stress and cognition are outlined.•Analysis of neuroendocrine stress research and its relevance for cognition.•Moderators in the association between stress and cognition are analyzed.•Moderators include experimental and task-specific factors, and individual differences.•A systematic framework for the classification of studies on this topic is provided. A multitude of studies investigating the effects of stress on cognition has produced an inconsistent picture on whether - and under which conditions - stress has advantageous or disadvantageous effects on executive functions (EF). This review provides a short introduction to the concept of stress and its neurobiology, before discussing the need to consider moderating factors in the association between stress and EF. Three core domains are described and discussed in relation to the interplay between stress and cognition: the influence of different paradigms on physiological stress reactivity, individual differences in demographic and biological factors, and task-related features of cognitive tasks. Although some moderating variables such as the endocrine stress response have frequently been considered in single studies, no attempt of a holistic overview has been made so far. Therefore, we propose a more nuanced and systematic framework to study the effects of stress on executive functioning, comprising a holistic overview from the induction of stress, via biological mechanisms and interactions with individual differences, to the influence of stress on cognitive performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107254
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2409195557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1074742720300988</els_id><sourcerecordid>2409195557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-d3244a5d064d0ce90e3a9e0efaf0161ec2a1206d22fc90c2108fed18649a8c553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouP75AN56Ei9dkzRpGz0ti67Cggf1HEIykSxtsybpqt_elHr2NG-G9wbeD6ErgpcEk_p2txy6fkkxnfaGcnaEFgQLXgpes-NJN6xsGG1O0VmMO4wJ4aJdoM1rChBjcV3AN-gxuQMUdhx0cn5ww8ddsSoCHBx8FdoP0RkI-Vr0PguVJmmVTj7EC3RiVRfh8m-eo_fHh7f1U7l92TyvV9tSVxVOpakoY4obXDODNQgMlRKAwSqbWxDQVBGKa0Op1QJrSnBrwZC2ZkK1mvPqHN3Mf_fBf44Qk-xd1NB1agA_RkkZFkRwzptsJbNVBx9jACv3wfUq_EiC5QRN7mSGJidocoaWM_dzBnKHXDvIqB0MGowLoJM03v2T_gU61nSl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2409195557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stress &amp; executive functioning: A review considering moderating factors</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Plieger, Thomas ; Reuter, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Plieger, Thomas ; Reuter, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Inconsistencies in the association between stress and cognition are outlined.•Analysis of neuroendocrine stress research and its relevance for cognition.•Moderators in the association between stress and cognition are analyzed.•Moderators include experimental and task-specific factors, and individual differences.•A systematic framework for the classification of studies on this topic is provided. A multitude of studies investigating the effects of stress on cognition has produced an inconsistent picture on whether - and under which conditions - stress has advantageous or disadvantageous effects on executive functions (EF). This review provides a short introduction to the concept of stress and its neurobiology, before discussing the need to consider moderating factors in the association between stress and EF. Three core domains are described and discussed in relation to the interplay between stress and cognition: the influence of different paradigms on physiological stress reactivity, individual differences in demographic and biological factors, and task-related features of cognitive tasks. Although some moderating variables such as the endocrine stress response have frequently been considered in single studies, no attempt of a holistic overview has been made so far. Therefore, we propose a more nuanced and systematic framework to study the effects of stress on executive functioning, comprising a holistic overview from the induction of stress, via biological mechanisms and interactions with individual differences, to the influence of stress on cognitive performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-7427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9564</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cognitive functioning ; Cortisol ; Executive control ; HPA axis ; Stress ; Stress reactivity</subject><ispartof>Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2020-09, Vol.173, p.107254-107254, Article 107254</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-d3244a5d064d0ce90e3a9e0efaf0161ec2a1206d22fc90c2108fed18649a8c553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-d3244a5d064d0ce90e3a9e0efaf0161ec2a1206d22fc90c2108fed18649a8c553</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9055-7619</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107254$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plieger, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Stress &amp; executive functioning: A review considering moderating factors</title><title>Neurobiology of learning and memory</title><description>[Display omitted] •Inconsistencies in the association between stress and cognition are outlined.•Analysis of neuroendocrine stress research and its relevance for cognition.•Moderators in the association between stress and cognition are analyzed.•Moderators include experimental and task-specific factors, and individual differences.•A systematic framework for the classification of studies on this topic is provided. A multitude of studies investigating the effects of stress on cognition has produced an inconsistent picture on whether - and under which conditions - stress has advantageous or disadvantageous effects on executive functions (EF). This review provides a short introduction to the concept of stress and its neurobiology, before discussing the need to consider moderating factors in the association between stress and EF. Three core domains are described and discussed in relation to the interplay between stress and cognition: the influence of different paradigms on physiological stress reactivity, individual differences in demographic and biological factors, and task-related features of cognitive tasks. Although some moderating variables such as the endocrine stress response have frequently been considered in single studies, no attempt of a holistic overview has been made so far. Therefore, we propose a more nuanced and systematic framework to study the effects of stress on executive functioning, comprising a holistic overview from the induction of stress, via biological mechanisms and interactions with individual differences, to the influence of stress on cognitive performance.</description><subject>Cognitive functioning</subject><subject>Cortisol</subject><subject>Executive control</subject><subject>HPA axis</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress reactivity</subject><issn>1074-7427</issn><issn>1095-9564</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouP75AN56Ei9dkzRpGz0ti67Cggf1HEIykSxtsybpqt_elHr2NG-G9wbeD6ErgpcEk_p2txy6fkkxnfaGcnaEFgQLXgpes-NJN6xsGG1O0VmMO4wJ4aJdoM1rChBjcV3AN-gxuQMUdhx0cn5ww8ddsSoCHBx8FdoP0RkI-Vr0PguVJmmVTj7EC3RiVRfh8m-eo_fHh7f1U7l92TyvV9tSVxVOpakoY4obXDODNQgMlRKAwSqbWxDQVBGKa0Op1QJrSnBrwZC2ZkK1mvPqHN3Mf_fBf44Qk-xd1NB1agA_RkkZFkRwzptsJbNVBx9jACv3wfUq_EiC5QRN7mSGJidocoaWM_dzBnKHXDvIqB0MGowLoJM03v2T_gU61nSl</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Plieger, Thomas</creator><creator>Reuter, Martin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-7619</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Stress &amp; executive functioning: A review considering moderating factors</title><author>Plieger, Thomas ; Reuter, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-d3244a5d064d0ce90e3a9e0efaf0161ec2a1206d22fc90c2108fed18649a8c553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cognitive functioning</topic><topic>Cortisol</topic><topic>Executive control</topic><topic>HPA axis</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress reactivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plieger, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurobiology of learning and memory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plieger, Thomas</au><au>Reuter, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stress &amp; executive functioning: A review considering moderating factors</atitle><jtitle>Neurobiology of learning and memory</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>173</volume><spage>107254</spage><epage>107254</epage><pages>107254-107254</pages><artnum>107254</artnum><issn>1074-7427</issn><eissn>1095-9564</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Inconsistencies in the association between stress and cognition are outlined.•Analysis of neuroendocrine stress research and its relevance for cognition.•Moderators in the association between stress and cognition are analyzed.•Moderators include experimental and task-specific factors, and individual differences.•A systematic framework for the classification of studies on this topic is provided. A multitude of studies investigating the effects of stress on cognition has produced an inconsistent picture on whether - and under which conditions - stress has advantageous or disadvantageous effects on executive functions (EF). This review provides a short introduction to the concept of stress and its neurobiology, before discussing the need to consider moderating factors in the association between stress and EF. Three core domains are described and discussed in relation to the interplay between stress and cognition: the influence of different paradigms on physiological stress reactivity, individual differences in demographic and biological factors, and task-related features of cognitive tasks. Although some moderating variables such as the endocrine stress response have frequently been considered in single studies, no attempt of a holistic overview has been made so far. Therefore, we propose a more nuanced and systematic framework to study the effects of stress on executive functioning, comprising a holistic overview from the induction of stress, via biological mechanisms and interactions with individual differences, to the influence of stress on cognitive performance.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107254</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-7619</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1074-7427
ispartof Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2020-09, Vol.173, p.107254-107254, Article 107254
issn 1074-7427
1095-9564
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2409195557
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cognitive functioning
Cortisol
Executive control
HPA axis
Stress
Stress reactivity
title Stress & executive functioning: A review considering moderating factors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A36%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stress%20&%20executive%20functioning:%20A%20review%20considering%20moderating%20factors&rft.jtitle=Neurobiology%20of%20learning%20and%20memory&rft.au=Plieger,%20Thomas&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=173&rft.spage=107254&rft.epage=107254&rft.pages=107254-107254&rft.artnum=107254&rft.issn=1074-7427&rft.eissn=1095-9564&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2409195557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2409195557&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1074742720300988&rfr_iscdi=true