Correlates, Course, and Outcomes of Increased Energy in Youth with Bipolar Disorder

•Youth with vs without baseline increased energy were more likely to have bipolar I/NOS•Youth with baseline increased energy had higher mania/depression total scores•There was comparable frequency of increased energy between groups after 5 years•There were no group differences on clinical/functioning outcomes over 12.5 years•Limitations include secondary data study design; groupings based on one time point Compare longitudinal trajectories of youth with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV Bipolar Disorder (BD), grouped at baseline by presence/absence of increased energy during their worst lifetime mood episode (required for DSM-5). Participants from the parent Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth study (N = 446) were assessed utilizing The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (KSADS), KSADS Mania Rating Scale (KMRS), and KSADS Depression Rating Scale (KDRS). Youth were grouped at baseline into those with increased energy (meeting DSM-5 Criteria A for mania) vs. without increased energy (meeting DSM-IV, but not DSM-5, Criteria A for mania), for those who had worst lifetime mood episode recorded (n = 430). Youth with available longitudinal data had the presence/absence of increased energy measured, as well as psychiatric symptomatology/clinical outcomes (evaluated via the Adolescent Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation), at each follow-up for 12.5 years (n = 398). At baseline, the increased energy group (based on endorsed increased energy during worst lifetime mood episode; 86% of participants) vs. the without increased energy group, were more likely to meet criteria for BD-I and BD Not Otherwise Specified, had higher KMRS/KDRS total scores, and displayed poorer family/global psychosocial functioning. However, frequency of increased energy between groups was comparable after 5 years, and no significant group differences were found on clinical/psychosocial functioning outcomes after 12.5 years. Secondary data limited study design; groupings were based on one time point. Results indicate no clinically relevant longitudinal group differences.