Deviance detection in physiologically identified cell types in the rat auditory cortex

Auditory deviance detection is a function of the auditory system that allows reduction of the processing demand for repetitive stimuli while stressing unpredictable ones, which are potentially more informative. Deviance detection has been extensively studied in humans using the oddball paradigm, whi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hearing research 2021-01, Vol.399, p.107997-107997, Article 107997
Hauptverfasser: Pérez-González, David, Parras, Gloria G., Morado-Díaz, Camilo J., Aedo-Sánchez, Cristian, Carbajal, Guillermo V., Malmierca, Manuel S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Auditory deviance detection is a function of the auditory system that allows reduction of the processing demand for repetitive stimuli while stressing unpredictable ones, which are potentially more informative. Deviance detection has been extensively studied in humans using the oddball paradigm, which evokes an event-related potential known as mismatch negativity (MMN). The same stimulation paradigms are used in animal studies that aim to elucidate the neuronal mechanisms underlying deviance detection. In order to understand the circuitry responsible for deviance detection in the auditory cortex (AC), it is necessary to determine the properties of excitatory and inhibitory neurons separately. Measuring the spike widths of neurons recorded extracellularly from the anaesthetized rat AC, we classified them as fast spiking or regular spiking units. These two neuron types are generally considered as putative inhibitory or excitatory, respectively. In response to an oddball paradigm, we found that both types of units showed similar amounts of deviance detection overall. When considering each AC field separately, we found that only in A1 fast spiking neurons showed higher deviance detection levels than regular spiking neurons, while in the rest of the fields there was no such distinction. Interpreting these responses in the context of the predictive coding framework, we found that the responses of both types of units reflect mainly prediction error signaling (i.e., genuine deviance detection) rather than repetition suppression. •Single units from the auditory cortex were classified as excitatory or inhibitory.•Both inhibitory and excitatory units showed deviance detection.•Inhibitory units showed larger deviance detection than excitatory units in A1 only.•The responses indicated prediction error rather than repetition suppression.•Both types of neurons may contribute to the deviance detection cortical circuits.
ISSN:0378-5955
1878-5891
DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2020.107997