Current status of pediatric neurocritical care in Argentina

Introduction. Patients with neurocritical injuries account for 10-16 % of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions and frequently require neuromonitoring. Objective. To describe the current status of neuromonitoring in Argentina. Methods. Survey with 37 questions about neuromonitoring without...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archivos argentinos de pediatría 2020-06, Vol.118 (3), p.204-209
Hauptverfasser: Neira, Pablo, Monteverde, Ezequiel, Perez, Augusto, Morales, Gaston, Landry, Luis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction. Patients with neurocritical injuries account for 10-16 % of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions and frequently require neuromonitoring. Objective. To describe the current status of neuromonitoring in Argentina. Methods. Survey with 37 questions about neuromonitoring without including patients' data. Period: April-June 2017. Results.Thirty-eight responses were received out of 71 requests (14 districts with 11498 annual discharges). The PICU/hospital bed ratio was 21.9 (range: 4.2-66.7). Seventy-four percent of PICUs were public; 61%, university-affiliated; and 71%, level I. The availability of monitoring techniques was similar between public and private (percentages): intracranial pressure (95), electroencephalography (92), transcranial Doppler (53), evoked potentials (50), jugular saturation (47), and bispectral index (11). Trauma was the main reason for monitoring. Conclusion. Except for intracranial pressure and electroencephalography, neuromonitoring resources are scarce and active neurosurgery availability is minimal. A PICU national registry is required.
ISSN:0325-0075
1668-3501
DOI:10.5546/aap.2020.eng.204