The usefulness of the retinal sensitivity measurement with a microperimetry for predicting the visual prognosis of branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema

Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of the retinal sensitivity in branch retinal vein occlusion (BVO) with macular edema (ME) following the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment. Methods Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), microperimetry, and optical coherence tomography (OCT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2020-09, Vol.258 (9), p.1949-1958
Hauptverfasser: Fujino, Ryosuke, Asaoka, Ryo, Aoki, Shuichiro, Sugiura, Aya, Kusakabe, Mari, Asano-Shimizu, Kimiko, Nomura, Yoko, Aoki, Aya, Hashimoto, Yohei, Azuma, Keiko, Inoue, Tatsuya, Obata, Ryo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of the retinal sensitivity in branch retinal vein occlusion (BVO) with macular edema (ME) following the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment. Methods Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), microperimetry, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements were carried out in 20 patients with BVO with ME, at baseline and 1 month after the anti-VEGF treatment. The relationships among BCVA, mean retinal sensitivity (MS), macular volume (MV), central retinal thickness (CRT), integrity of ellipsoid zone (EZ), mean retinal sensitivity in the most affected quadrant (qMS), and macular volume in the most affected quadrant (qMV) were investigated. In addition, the relationships among the change in BCVA at 1 month (ΔBCVA1m), mean sensitivity in the most affected quadrant at 1 month (ΔqMS1m), MV in the most affected quadrant at 1 month (ΔqMV1m), and CRT at 1 month (ΔCRT1m) were analyzed. The optimal model for BCVA at 3 months after the treatment (BCVA3m) was identified. Results There was not a significant difference in BCVA (paired Wilcoxon test, p  = 0.058) between at baseline and after the treatment, but there were significant differences in MS, MV, CRT, qMS, and qMV ( p  
ISSN:0721-832X
1435-702X
DOI:10.1007/s00417-020-04759-9