A comparative study of heterogeneous antibiotic resistance of microbial populations in conventional periprosthetic tissue cultures and sonication fluid cultures of orthopaedics explanted prostheses

Background “Heterogeneity” describes a phenomenon where subpopulations of seemingly isogenic bacteria exhibit a range of susceptibilities to a particular antibiotic. We aim to investigate the frequency of heterogeneity among microbes isolated from infected prostheses, and its possible correlation wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology 2020-10, Vol.30 (7), p.1307-1318
Hauptverfasser: Banousi, Angeliki, Evangelopoulos, Dimitrios S., Stylianakis, Antonios, Fandridis, Emmanouil, Chatziioannou, Sofia, Sipsas, Nikolaos V., Pneumaticos, Spyridon G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background “Heterogeneity” describes a phenomenon where subpopulations of seemingly isogenic bacteria exhibit a range of susceptibilities to a particular antibiotic. We aim to investigate the frequency of heterogeneity among microbes isolated from infected prostheses, and its possible correlation with microbial resistance. Methods Between May 2014 and June 2019, we investigated 234 patients, at our institution, undergoing revision arthroplasty because of loosening of the prostheses or because of periprosthetic joint infection. All patients had periprosthetic tissue culture, sonication of prosthesis and direct inoculation of Sonication fluid into blood culture bottles. We assessed the presence of heterogeneity among all pathogens isolated from infected prostheses. Results Using standard non-microbiological criteria to determine periprosthetic joint infection, it was found that 143 patient (61.1%) had aseptic loosening while 91 patients (38.9%) had periprosthetic joint infection. Comparing the two methods, the results of our study showed that the method of sonication was significantly more sensitive than tissue culture [91% (83–96) vs. 43% (33–54); p  
ISSN:1633-8065
1432-1068
DOI:10.1007/s00590-020-02704-4