Automated detection and classification of shoulder arthroplasty models using deep learning

Objective To develop and evaluate the performance of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) to detect and identify specific total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) models. Materials and methods We included 482 radiography studies obtained from publicly available image repositories with native shoulders...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Skeletal radiology 2020-10, Vol.49 (10), p.1623-1632
Hauptverfasser: Yi, Paul H., Kim, Tae Kyung, Wei, Jinchi, Li, Xinning, Hager, Gregory D., Sair, Haris I., Fritz, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To develop and evaluate the performance of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) to detect and identify specific total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) models. Materials and methods We included 482 radiography studies obtained from publicly available image repositories with native shoulders, reverse TSA (RTSA) implants, and five different TSA models. We trained separate ResNet DCNN–based binary classifiers to (1) detect the presence of shoulder arthroplasty implants, (2) differentiate between TSA and RTSA, and (3) differentiate between the five TSA models, using five individual classifiers for each model, respectively. Datasets were divided into training, validation, and test datasets. Training and validation datasets were 20-fold augmented. Test performances were assessed with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC-ROC) analyses. Class activation mapping was used to identify distinguishing imaging features used for DCNN classification decisions. Results The DCNN for the detection of the presence of shoulder arthroplasty implants achieved an AUC-ROC of 1.0, whereas the AUC-ROC for differentiation between TSA and RTSA was 0.97. Class activation map analysis demonstrated the emphasis on the characteristic arthroplasty components in decision-making. DCNNs trained to distinguish between the five TSA models achieved AUC-ROCs ranging from 0.86 for Stryker Solar to 1.0 for Zimmer Bigliani-Flatow with class activation map analysis demonstrating an emphasis on unique implant design features. Conclusion DCNNs can accurately identify the presence of and distinguish between TSA & RTSA, and classify five specific TSA models with high accuracy. The proof of concept of these DCNNs may set the foundation for an automated arthroplasty atlas for rapid and comprehensive model identification.
ISSN:0364-2348
1432-2161
DOI:10.1007/s00256-020-03463-3