Recommended operating room practice during the COVID‐19 pandemic: systematic review

Background The COVID‐19 pandemic poses a critical global public health crisis. Operating room (OR) best practice in this crisis is poorly defined. This systematic review was performed to identify contemporary evidence relating to OR practice in the context of COVID‐19. Methods MEDLINE was searched s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJS Open 2020-10, Vol.4 (5), p.748-756
Hauptverfasser: Abdelrahman, T., Ansell, J., Brown, C., Egan, R., Evans, T., Ryan Harper, E., Harries, R. L., Hopkins, L., James, O., Lewis, S., Lewis, W. G., Luton, O., Mellor, K., Powell, A. G., Robinson, D., Thomas, R., Williams, A., Beamish, A. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The COVID‐19 pandemic poses a critical global public health crisis. Operating room (OR) best practice in this crisis is poorly defined. This systematic review was performed to identify contemporary evidence relating to OR practice in the context of COVID‐19. Methods MEDLINE was searched systematically using PubMed (search date 19 March 2020) for relevant studies in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Documented practices and guidance were assessed to determine Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence, and recommendations for practice within five domains were extracted: physical OR, personnel, patient, procedure, and other factors. Results Thirty‐five articles were identified, of which 11 met eligibility criteria. Nine articles constituted expert opinion and two were retrospective studies. All articles originated from the Far East (China, 9; Singapore, 2); eight of the articles concerned general surgery. Common themes were identified within each domain, but all recommendations were based on low levels of evidence (median OCEBM level 5 (range 4–5)). The highest number of overlapping recommendations related to physical OR (8 articles) and procedural factors (13). Although few recommendations related to personnel factors, consensus was high in this domain, with all studies mandating the use of personal protective equipment. Conclusion There was little evidence to inform this systematic review, but there was consensus regarding many aspects of OR practice. Within the context of a rapidly evolving pandemic, timely amalgamation of global practice and experiences is needed to inform best practice. Antecedentes La pandemia por COVID‐19 plantea una crisis crítica de salud pública a nivel mundial. La mejor práctica en el quirófano en esta crisis está mal definida. Esta revisión sistemática se realizó para identificar la evidencia contemporánea relacionada con la práctica en el quirófano en el contexto del COVID‐19. Métodos Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en Medline usando PubMed (fecha de búsqueda, 19 de marzo de 2020) para seleccionar estudios relevantes de acuerdo con las directrices PRISMA. Las prácticas documentadas y las guías se evaluaron para determinar los niveles de evidencia según la normativa Oxford (Oxford levels of evidence, OLE), y se extrajeron las recomendaciones para la práctica en el entorno de cinco ámbitos: físico en el quirófano, personal, paciente, procedimiento y otros factores. Resultados Se identifica
ISSN:2474-9842
2474-9842
DOI:10.1002/bjs5.50304