Sexual dimorphism in size and shape among populations of the lizard Sceloporus variabilis (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae)
•Sceloporus variabilis is a species with males larger than females on body size.•Morphological variation in size and shape attributes in this species are unknown.•Sexual dimorphism between sexes and populations using size and shape was evaluate.•There was variation in sexual dimorphism in size, with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zoology (Jena) 2020-06, Vol.140, p.125781-125781, Article 125781 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Sceloporus variabilis is a species with males larger than females on body size.•Morphological variation in size and shape attributes in this species are unknown.•Sexual dimorphism between sexes and populations using size and shape was evaluate.•There was variation in sexual dimorphism in size, with male-biased.•There was variation in both sexes considering the shape.
Sexual dimorphism in lizards is determined by ecological and environmental factors. Broadly distributed species may show variation in patterns of sexual dimorphism toward either sex, as well as exhibiting variation in morphological dimensions. In the present study, sexual dimorphism in size and shape attributes was evaluated in three populations of the lizard Sceloporus variabilis from different environments in Mexico. We evaluated the size attributes of 10 morphological variables: snout-vent length (SVL), tibia length (TL), femur length (FeL), forearm length (FoL), interaxial distance (ID), head length (HL), head width (HW), head height (HH), jaw length (JL), and jaw width (JW). We also evaluated the attributes of shape (relative dimensions of the 10 morphological variables). In the size attribute, sexual dimorphism was found, with males being larger than females. In the case of shape, sexual dimorphism was found, with the females being larger in relative dimensions of ID and JW. Also, the males showed larger relative dimensions in TL, FeL and FoL. Differences were found between populations in the dimension of the variables analyzed in each sex. The pattern in size can be explained by sexual selection, where the males of each population maintain larger dimensions to compete for territory and access to females. In shape, females can be favored if they have larger relative ID and JW, as it promotes maintenance of clutch sizes, and use of microhabitats and different consumption of prey types than males. In the case of males, relative dimensions of TL, FeL and FoL may be functioning as important traits for escape from predators. The present study shows the importance of incorporating size and shape variables into analyses of sexual dimorphism among populations of a single species with a wide distribution. These types of studies help to identify the causes that promote sexual dimorphism, as well as the degree of difference among populations that inhabit different environments. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0944-2006 1873-2720 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.zool.2020.125781 |