Comparison of two Lynch screening strategies in endometrial cancer in a California health system

Compare detection of Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer between regions of a health care system with different screening strategies. A retrospective study of endometrial cancer (EC) cases from 2 regions of an integrated health care system (Kaiser Permanente Northern (KPNC) and Southern (KPSC) Cali...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2020-07, Vol.158 (1), p.158-166
Hauptverfasser: Lentz, Scott E., Salyer, Chelsea V., Dontsi, Makdine, Armstrong, Mary Anne, Hoodfar, Elizabeth, Alvarado, Monica M., Avila, Monica, Nguyen, Nancy T., Powell, C. Bethan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Compare detection of Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer between regions of a health care system with different screening strategies. A retrospective study of endometrial cancer (EC) cases from 2 regions of an integrated health care system (Kaiser Permanente Northern (KPNC) and Southern (KPSC) California). Within KPNC, immunohistochemistry tumor screening (IHC) was physician ordered and risk-based; within KPSC, IHC was universal and automated. Clinical risk factors associated with abnormal IHC and Lynch Syndrome (LS) were identified. During the study, there were 2045 endometrial cancers: 1399 in the physician-order group and 646 in the universal testing group. In the physician-order group: among women < age 60, 34% underwent IHC; 9.6% were abnormal, and 3% were possible LS after methylation testing; among women ≥60, 11% underwent IHC, 3% were abnormal and
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.692