Efficacy and safety of moxibustion for chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
To systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy of moxibustion in treating patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). A systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, CBM, Wanfang, CNKI and VIP (until November, 2019) was used to identify studies reporting p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Complementary therapies in clinical practice 2020-05, Vol.39, p.101130-101130, Article 101130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy of moxibustion in treating patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP).
A systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, CBM, Wanfang, CNKI and VIP (until November, 2019) was used to identify studies reporting pain intensity (VAS or NRS), disability (ODI or RMDQ), JOA score, and quality of life (SF-36) in patients with CLBP. Study selection, data extraction was performed critically and independently by two reviewers. Cochrane criteria for risk of bias was used to assess the methodological quality of the trials. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Methodology (GRADE) was applied to test the quality of evidence from the quantitative analysis.
Ten RCTs, including 987 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Moxibustion had a superior effect on VAS score when compared with western medicine [RR = −1.69, 95%CI(-2.40, −0.98), p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1744-3881 1873-6947 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101130 |