The impact of illness identity on recovery from severe mental illness: A review of the evidence
•111 studies testing components of the illness identity model were reviewed.•The most frequently tested aspects of the model were relationships between self-stigma and self-esteem, psychiatric symptoms and social relationships.•Relationships with hope were less frequently studied but supported in al...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatry research 2020-06, Vol.288, p.112950-112950, Article 112950 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •111 studies testing components of the illness identity model were reviewed.•The most frequently tested aspects of the model were relationships between self-stigma and self-esteem, psychiatric symptoms and social relationships.•Relationships with hope were less frequently studied but supported in all studies.•The least frequently studied aspects of the model were relationships with suicide, avoidant coping, treatment adherence and vocational functioning, although they were supported in the majority of studies.•Findings were robust to geographic location of study and subpopulation studied. Findings indicate that a large body of research has tested, and largely supported, the various components of the illness identity model.
The “Illness Identity” model proposed that self-stigma impacts hope and self-esteem and subsequently leads to a cascade of negative effects on outcomes related to recovery among people diagnosed with severe mental illnesses. The purpose of the present review is to take stock of research support for the model. The citation index SCOPUS was reviewed for all papers published in peer-reviewed journals in English between 2010 and 2019 citing one of the initial 3 articles discussing the model: 111 studies met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The most frequently tested, and supported, aspects of the model were relationships between self-stigma and self-esteem, hope, psychiatric symptoms and social relationships. Least frequently studied areas were relationships with suicide, avoidant coping, treatment adherence and vocational functioning, although they were supported in the majority of studies. The “insight paradox” was also tested in a relatively small number of studies, with mixed results. Findings were robust to geographic location of study, method, and subpopulation studied. Findings indicate that a large body of research has tested, and largely supported, the various components of the Illness Identity model, although some components need further investigation and there is a need for more comprehensive tests of the model. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-1781 1872-7123 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112950 |