Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems

Despite the central importance of crew safety in designing and operating a life support system, the metric commonly used to evaluate alternative Advanced Life Support (ALS) technologies does not currently provide explicit techniques for measuring safety. The resilience of a system, or the system s a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific and technical aerospace reports 2004-02, Vol.42 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Bell, Ann Maria, Dearden, Richard, Levri, Julie A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Scientific and technical aerospace reports
container_volume 42
creator Bell, Ann Maria
Dearden, Richard
Levri, Julie A
description Despite the central importance of crew safety in designing and operating a life support system, the metric commonly used to evaluate alternative Advanced Life Support (ALS) technologies does not currently provide explicit techniques for measuring safety. The resilience of a system, or the system s ability to meet performance requirements and recover from component-level faults, is fundamentally a dynamic property. This paper motivates the use of computer models as a tool to understand and improve system resilience throughout the design process. Extensive simulation of a hybrid computational model of a water revitalization subsystem (WRS) with probabilistic, component-level faults provides data about off-nominal behavior of the system. The data can then be used to test alternative measures of resilience as predictors of the system s ability to recover from component-level faults. A novel approach to measuring system resilience using a Markov chain model of performance data is also developed. Results emphasize that resilience depends on the complex interaction of faults, controls, and system dynamics, rather than on simple fault probabilities.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_23972421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>23972421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_239724213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0OwiAUQGEGTaw_73AntyYUalpmo3Fxc29Ie1sxFJALJr69Dj6A0_mGs2BFdajbsm1ls2JrogfnQtW8Kpi6oqYcjZsg3REikrEGXY_gR9DDS385gDUjAuUQfExAb0o405YtR20Jd79u2P58uh0vZYj-mZFSNxvq0Vrt0GfqhFSNqEUl_x4_zoY5jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>23972421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems</title><source>U.S. Government Documents</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bell, Ann Maria ; Dearden, Richard ; Levri, Julie A</creator><creatorcontrib>Bell, Ann Maria ; Dearden, Richard ; Levri, Julie A</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the central importance of crew safety in designing and operating a life support system, the metric commonly used to evaluate alternative Advanced Life Support (ALS) technologies does not currently provide explicit techniques for measuring safety. The resilience of a system, or the system s ability to meet performance requirements and recover from component-level faults, is fundamentally a dynamic property. This paper motivates the use of computer models as a tool to understand and improve system resilience throughout the design process. Extensive simulation of a hybrid computational model of a water revitalization subsystem (WRS) with probabilistic, component-level faults provides data about off-nominal behavior of the system. The data can then be used to test alternative measures of resilience as predictors of the system s ability to recover from component-level faults. A novel approach to measuring system resilience using a Markov chain model of performance data is also developed. Results emphasize that resilience depends on the complex interaction of faults, controls, and system dynamics, rather than on simple fault probabilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1548-8837</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Scientific and technical aerospace reports, 2004-02, Vol.42 (4)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bell, Ann Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dearden, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levri, Julie A</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems</title><title>Scientific and technical aerospace reports</title><description>Despite the central importance of crew safety in designing and operating a life support system, the metric commonly used to evaluate alternative Advanced Life Support (ALS) technologies does not currently provide explicit techniques for measuring safety. The resilience of a system, or the system s ability to meet performance requirements and recover from component-level faults, is fundamentally a dynamic property. This paper motivates the use of computer models as a tool to understand and improve system resilience throughout the design process. Extensive simulation of a hybrid computational model of a water revitalization subsystem (WRS) with probabilistic, component-level faults provides data about off-nominal behavior of the system. The data can then be used to test alternative measures of resilience as predictors of the system s ability to recover from component-level faults. A novel approach to measuring system resilience using a Markov chain model of performance data is also developed. Results emphasize that resilience depends on the complex interaction of faults, controls, and system dynamics, rather than on simple fault probabilities.</description><issn>1548-8837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNyr0OwiAUQGEGTaw_73AntyYUalpmo3Fxc29Ie1sxFJALJr69Dj6A0_mGs2BFdajbsm1ls2JrogfnQtW8Kpi6oqYcjZsg3REikrEGXY_gR9DDS385gDUjAuUQfExAb0o405YtR20Jd79u2P58uh0vZYj-mZFSNxvq0Vrt0GfqhFSNqEUl_x4_zoY5jw</recordid><startdate>20040227</startdate><enddate>20040227</enddate><creator>Bell, Ann Maria</creator><creator>Dearden, Richard</creator><creator>Levri, Julie A</creator><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040227</creationdate><title>Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems</title><author>Bell, Ann Maria ; Dearden, Richard ; Levri, Julie A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_239724213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bell, Ann Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dearden, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levri, Julie A</creatorcontrib><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Scientific and technical aerospace reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bell, Ann Maria</au><au>Dearden, Richard</au><au>Levri, Julie A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems</atitle><jtitle>Scientific and technical aerospace reports</jtitle><date>2004-02-27</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>1548-8837</issn><abstract>Despite the central importance of crew safety in designing and operating a life support system, the metric commonly used to evaluate alternative Advanced Life Support (ALS) technologies does not currently provide explicit techniques for measuring safety. The resilience of a system, or the system s ability to meet performance requirements and recover from component-level faults, is fundamentally a dynamic property. This paper motivates the use of computer models as a tool to understand and improve system resilience throughout the design process. Extensive simulation of a hybrid computational model of a water revitalization subsystem (WRS) with probabilistic, component-level faults provides data about off-nominal behavior of the system. The data can then be used to test alternative measures of resilience as predictors of the system s ability to recover from component-level faults. A novel approach to measuring system resilience using a Markov chain model of performance data is also developed. Results emphasize that resilience depends on the complex interaction of faults, controls, and system dynamics, rather than on simple fault probabilities.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1548-8837
ispartof Scientific and technical aerospace reports, 2004-02, Vol.42 (4)
issn 1548-8837
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_23972421
source U.S. Government Documents; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T04%3A38%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20resilience%20of%20advanced%20life%20support%20systems&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20and%20technical%20aerospace%20reports&rft.au=Bell,%20Ann%20Maria&rft.date=2004-02-27&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=1548-8837&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E23972421%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=23972421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true