Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems
Despite the central importance of crew safety in designing and operating a life support system, the metric commonly used to evaluate alternative Advanced Life Support (ALS) technologies does not currently provide explicit techniques for measuring safety. The resilience of a system, or the system s a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific and technical aerospace reports 2004-02, Vol.42 (4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Scientific and technical aerospace reports |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Bell, Ann Maria Dearden, Richard Levri, Julie A |
description | Despite the central importance of crew safety in designing and operating a life support system, the metric commonly used to evaluate alternative Advanced Life Support (ALS) technologies does not currently provide explicit techniques for measuring safety. The resilience of a system, or the system s ability to meet performance requirements and recover from component-level faults, is fundamentally a dynamic property. This paper motivates the use of computer models as a tool to understand and improve system resilience throughout the design process. Extensive simulation of a hybrid computational model of a water revitalization subsystem (WRS) with probabilistic, component-level faults provides data about off-nominal behavior of the system. The data can then be used to test alternative measures of resilience as predictors of the system s ability to recover from component-level faults. A novel approach to measuring system resilience using a Markov chain model of performance data is also developed. Results emphasize that resilience depends on the complex interaction of faults, controls, and system dynamics, rather than on simple fault probabilities. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_23972421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>23972421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_239724213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0OwiAUQGEGTaw_73AntyYUalpmo3Fxc29Ie1sxFJALJr69Dj6A0_mGs2BFdajbsm1ls2JrogfnQtW8Kpi6oqYcjZsg3REikrEGXY_gR9DDS385gDUjAuUQfExAb0o405YtR20Jd79u2P58uh0vZYj-mZFSNxvq0Vrt0GfqhFSNqEUl_x4_zoY5jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>23972421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems</title><source>U.S. Government Documents</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bell, Ann Maria ; Dearden, Richard ; Levri, Julie A</creator><creatorcontrib>Bell, Ann Maria ; Dearden, Richard ; Levri, Julie A</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the central importance of crew safety in designing and operating a life support system, the metric commonly used to evaluate alternative Advanced Life Support (ALS) technologies does not currently provide explicit techniques for measuring safety. The resilience of a system, or the system s ability to meet performance requirements and recover from component-level faults, is fundamentally a dynamic property. This paper motivates the use of computer models as a tool to understand and improve system resilience throughout the design process. Extensive simulation of a hybrid computational model of a water revitalization subsystem (WRS) with probabilistic, component-level faults provides data about off-nominal behavior of the system. The data can then be used to test alternative measures of resilience as predictors of the system s ability to recover from component-level faults. A novel approach to measuring system resilience using a Markov chain model of performance data is also developed. Results emphasize that resilience depends on the complex interaction of faults, controls, and system dynamics, rather than on simple fault probabilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1548-8837</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Scientific and technical aerospace reports, 2004-02, Vol.42 (4)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bell, Ann Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dearden, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levri, Julie A</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems</title><title>Scientific and technical aerospace reports</title><description>Despite the central importance of crew safety in designing and operating a life support system, the metric commonly used to evaluate alternative Advanced Life Support (ALS) technologies does not currently provide explicit techniques for measuring safety. The resilience of a system, or the system s ability to meet performance requirements and recover from component-level faults, is fundamentally a dynamic property. This paper motivates the use of computer models as a tool to understand and improve system resilience throughout the design process. Extensive simulation of a hybrid computational model of a water revitalization subsystem (WRS) with probabilistic, component-level faults provides data about off-nominal behavior of the system. The data can then be used to test alternative measures of resilience as predictors of the system s ability to recover from component-level faults. A novel approach to measuring system resilience using a Markov chain model of performance data is also developed. Results emphasize that resilience depends on the complex interaction of faults, controls, and system dynamics, rather than on simple fault probabilities.</description><issn>1548-8837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNyr0OwiAUQGEGTaw_73AntyYUalpmo3Fxc29Ie1sxFJALJr69Dj6A0_mGs2BFdajbsm1ls2JrogfnQtW8Kpi6oqYcjZsg3REikrEGXY_gR9DDS385gDUjAuUQfExAb0o405YtR20Jd79u2P58uh0vZYj-mZFSNxvq0Vrt0GfqhFSNqEUl_x4_zoY5jw</recordid><startdate>20040227</startdate><enddate>20040227</enddate><creator>Bell, Ann Maria</creator><creator>Dearden, Richard</creator><creator>Levri, Julie A</creator><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040227</creationdate><title>Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems</title><author>Bell, Ann Maria ; Dearden, Richard ; Levri, Julie A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_239724213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bell, Ann Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dearden, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levri, Julie A</creatorcontrib><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Scientific and technical aerospace reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bell, Ann Maria</au><au>Dearden, Richard</au><au>Levri, Julie A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems</atitle><jtitle>Scientific and technical aerospace reports</jtitle><date>2004-02-27</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>1548-8837</issn><abstract>Despite the central importance of crew safety in designing and operating a life support system, the metric commonly used to evaluate alternative Advanced Life Support (ALS) technologies does not currently provide explicit techniques for measuring safety. The resilience of a system, or the system s ability to meet performance requirements and recover from component-level faults, is fundamentally a dynamic property. This paper motivates the use of computer models as a tool to understand and improve system resilience throughout the design process. Extensive simulation of a hybrid computational model of a water revitalization subsystem (WRS) with probabilistic, component-level faults provides data about off-nominal behavior of the system. The data can then be used to test alternative measures of resilience as predictors of the system s ability to recover from component-level faults. A novel approach to measuring system resilience using a Markov chain model of performance data is also developed. Results emphasize that resilience depends on the complex interaction of faults, controls, and system dynamics, rather than on simple fault probabilities.</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1548-8837 |
ispartof | Scientific and technical aerospace reports, 2004-02, Vol.42 (4) |
issn | 1548-8837 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_23972421 |
source | U.S. Government Documents; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Measuring the resilience of advanced life support systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T04%3A38%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20resilience%20of%20advanced%20life%20support%20systems&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20and%20technical%20aerospace%20reports&rft.au=Bell,%20Ann%20Maria&rft.date=2004-02-27&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=1548-8837&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E23972421%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=23972421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |