Interrater variation of vascular classifications used in enhanced laryngeal contact endoscopy

Purpose Combined use of contact endoscopy (CE) and Narrow Band Imaging (NBI, Olympus ® ) is suggested for the visualization of specific vascular changes indicative of glottic neoplasia. We investigated the interrater reliability and agreement in 3 recognized classification systems of vascular change...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2020-09, Vol.277 (9), p.2485-2492
Hauptverfasser: Mehlum, Camilla Slot, Døssing, Helle, Davaris, Nikolaos, Giers, Anja, Grøntved, Ågot Møller, Kjaergaard, Thomas, Möller, Sören, Godballe, Christian, Arens, Christoph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Combined use of contact endoscopy (CE) and Narrow Band Imaging (NBI, Olympus ® ) is suggested for the visualization of specific vascular changes indicative of glottic neoplasia. We investigated the interrater reliability and agreement in 3 recognized classification systems of vascular changes applied to images from CE + NBI in patients suspected for glottic neoplasia. Methods Six experienced head and neck surgeons familiar with NBI rated 120 images obtained by CE + NBI by 3 classification systems of vascular changes as suggested by Ni et al. (N-C), Puxeddu et al. (P-C), and the European Laryngological Society (ELS-C). Three raters were experienced in CE, and three raters had only limited experience with CE. Crude agreement and Fleiss’ kappa with 95% confidence interval were estimated for all 6 raters, and for the 2 levels of expertise for each original classification system and for dichotomized versions of the N-C and the P-C based on suggested neoplastic potential. Results The interrater crude agreement and the corresponding kappa values for the ELS-C were good and significantly higher than those for the N-C and P-C for all raters, irrespective of the level of experience with CE ( p  
ISSN:0937-4477
1434-4726
DOI:10.1007/s00405-020-06000-z