Time‐lasting ceramic stains and glaze: A toothbrush simulation study
Objective To evaluate and compare color stability and gloss retention of ceramic stains and glaze under simulated toothbrushing using dentifrices with different relative dentin abrasion (RDA). Materials and Methods Feldspathic porcelain, lithium disilicate, 3 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2020-09, Vol.32 (6), p.581-585 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To evaluate and compare color stability and gloss retention of ceramic stains and glaze under simulated toothbrushing using dentifrices with different relative dentin abrasion (RDA).
Materials and Methods
Feldspathic porcelain, lithium disilicate, 3 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconia, and 5 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconia were evaluated. Ceramics were externally stained, glazed and mounted in the toothbrush simulator. A toothbrush with 300 g force was applied. Regular toothpaste (72 RDA) and charcoal toothpaste (RDA .0001).
Conclusion
Glass‐phase ceramics retain stains longer than zirconia ceramics. Charcoal toothpaste affect color and gloss stability. Ceramic glaze maybe lost within the first 6 months in patients' mouth.
Clinical Significance
Long‐term color and gloss stability of externally stained and glazed ceramics maybe a clinical concern. Charcoal toothpastes enhance loss of color and gloss of ceramic restorations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1496-4155 1708-8240 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jerd.12590 |