Computed tomographic localization of the deepest portion of the femoral trochlear groove in healthy dogs

Objective To validate a computed tomographic (CT) method to measure the femoral trochlear groove depth (FTGD). Study design Cadaveric study. Sample population Fifteen dogs, 26 femoral trochleae. Methods Five points were identified from proximal to distal (proximal point [PP], P25, P50, P75, and dist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary surgery 2020-08, Vol.49 (6), p.1246-1254
Hauptverfasser: Nicetto, Tommaso, Longo, Federico, Contiero, Barbara, Isola, Maurizio, Petazzoni, Massimo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To validate a computed tomographic (CT) method to measure the femoral trochlear groove depth (FTGD). Study design Cadaveric study. Sample population Fifteen dogs, 26 femoral trochleae. Methods Five points were identified from proximal to distal (proximal point [PP], P25, P50, P75, and distal point [DP]) along the trochlea via three‐dimensional volume‐rendering function on the sagittal plane and measured on multiplanar reconstruction images. Each rater repeated measurements in duplicate, unaware of the identity of the joint. The FTGD was quantitated on the anatomical specimens and statistically compared with CT measurements. Intrarater and interrater agreements were analyzed by using intraclass coefficients. Accuracy was evaluated by using either adjusted R2 coefficients (R2 > 80% was considered acceptable) or Student's t test. The ratio of the patellar and the trochlear width and the ratio of the patellar craniocaudal thickness inside the trochlear groove were calculated at three different patellar locations. Results Good to excellent intrarater and interrater agreements were observed in four of five trochlear points (P25, P50, P75, and DP), and accuracy was acceptable for these points (R2 > 80%). Computed tomographic measurements differed from the mean anatomical measurements at three of five points (PP, P50, and P75; P 
ISSN:0161-3499
1532-950X
DOI:10.1111/vsu.13426