Evaluation of rotational grazing as a control strategy for Rhipicephalus microplus in a tropical region

Rhipicephalus microplus is the most significant tick of livestock and its control is particularly challenging due to its resistance to commercial acaricides. Pasture rotation is considered a management strategy that could help control R. microplus, however, the literature only contemplates mathemati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in veterinary science 2020-08, Vol.131, p.92-97
Hauptverfasser: Nicaretta, João Eduardo, dos Santos, Jordana Belos, Couto, Luiz Fellipe Monteiro, Heller, Luciana Maffini, Cruvinel, Leonardo Bueno, de Melo Júnior, Rubens Dias, de Assis Cavalcante, Alliny Souza, Zapa, Dina María Beltrán, Ferreira, Lorena Lopes, de Oliveira Monteiro, Caio Márcio, Soares, Vando Edesio, Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Rhipicephalus microplus is the most significant tick of livestock and its control is particularly challenging due to its resistance to commercial acaricides. Pasture rotation is considered a management strategy that could help control R. microplus, however, the literature only contemplates mathematical models and little is known about the effects of this practice in the field. The objective of this work was to determine whether pasture rotation is an efficient method for controlling R. microplus. Two different experiments were performed that involved groups of continuous and rotational grazing bovines. Female ticks measuring 4.5–8.0 mm were counted on animals while larvae in pasture were counted using the flannel drag technique. Treatment for infested bovines was applied when the average group tick count was ≥30 females. The results showed that rotational grazing (with 20-day periods of rest) had a higher tick count on-host than continuous grazing (P 
ISSN:0034-5288
1532-2661
DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.04.006