Surgery Resident Time Consumed by the Electronic Health Record

Time spent on the Electronic Health Record (EHR) influences surgical residents’ clinical availability. Objective data assessing EHR usage among surgical residents are lacking and necessary. Active EHR usage data for 70 surgical residents were collected from April 2015 through April 2016. Active EHR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical education 2020-09, Vol.77 (5), p.1056-1062
Hauptverfasser: Maloney, Sean R., Peterson, Sabrina, Kao, Angela M., Sherrill, William C., Green, John M., Sachdev, Gaurav
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Time spent on the Electronic Health Record (EHR) influences surgical residents’ clinical availability. Objective data assessing EHR usage among surgical residents are lacking and necessary. Active EHR usage data for 70 surgical residents were collected from April 2015 through April 2016. Active EHR usage was defined as more than 15 keystrokes, or 3 mouse clicks, or 1700 “mouse miles” per minute. Usage data of different specialties, interns (PGY 1), juniors (PGY 2, 3), and seniors (PGY 4, 5) were compared. Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC. Interns spent more time than juniors on total EHR activities per day (134.5 vs 105.5 minutes, p < 0.001) and juniors spent more time per day than seniors (105.5 vs 78.7 minutes, p < 0.001). Among different EHR activities per patient, interns spent greater time than juniors on chart review (8.1 vs 6.2 minutes, p < 0.001), documentation (9.0 vs 6.5 minutes, p < 0.001), and orders (3.6 vs 3.0 minutes, p < 0.001). Juniors spent the same time as seniors on chart review (6.2 vs 6.5 minutes, p = 0.2). Juniors spent more time than seniors on documentation (6.5 vs 5.2 minutes, p < 0.001) and orders (3.0 vs 2.7 minutes, p < 0.05). Comparing EHR activities per patient among different specialties, General Surgery residents spent more time than Orthopedic residents on total EHR time (19.9 vs 15.9 minutes, p < 0.001), chart review (6.8 vs 5.7 minutes, p < 0.001), documentation (6.3 vs 5.6 minutes, p < 0.001), and orders (3.6 vs 2.6 minutes, p < 0.001). General Surgery residents spent less time than OB/GYN residents on total EHR time (19.9 vs 22 minutes, p < 0.01), chart review (6.8 vs. 7.5 minutes, p < 0.05), and documentation (6.3 vs 7.6 minutes, p < 0.001), but more time on orders (3.6 vs 2.9 minutes, p < 0.001). These are the first reported objective findings on surgical resident use of the EHR and may provide an opportunity for improvement in EHR training and usage.
ISSN:1931-7204
1878-7452
DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.008