Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: results from the CLIMHET study group

Background Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRHC) is increasingly performed for the treatment of right colon disease. Nevertheless, standardization of the surgical technique regarding the performance of intracorporeal (IC) or extracorporeal (EC) anastomosis is lacking. The purpose of this study was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Techniques in coloproctology 2020-06, Vol.24 (6), p.585-592
Hauptverfasser: Bou Saleh, N., Voron, T., De’Angelis, N., Franco, I., Canoui-Poitrine, F., Mutter, D., Brunetti, F., Gagnière, J., Memeo, R., Pezet, D., Monange, B., Pereira, B., Le Roy, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRHC) is increasingly performed for the treatment of right colon disease. Nevertheless, standardization of the surgical technique regarding the performance of intracorporeal (IC) or extracorporeal (EC) anastomosis is lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term postoperative outcomes in patients who had laparoscopic right colectomy either with IC or EC. Methods This was a retrospective, non-randomized and multicenter study conducted from January 2005 to December 2015 on the CLIMHET study group cohort from five tertiary centers in France. Data were collected for all patients with LRHC to compare patient characteristics, intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes in terms of medical and surgical complications, duration of hospitalization and mortality. A multivariate analysis was performed to compare the results in the two groups. Results Of the 597 patients undergoing LRHC, 150 had IC and 447 had EC. The incidence of medical complications (cardiac, vascular, and pulmonary complications) was lower in the IC group than in the EC group (13 vs 20%, p  = 0.049). This difference remained significant in multivariate analysis after adjusting to field characteristics and patient histories ( p  = 0.009). Additionally, a shorter hospital stay (7 vs 8 days, p  = 0.003) was observed in the IC group as compared to the EC group. This difference remained significant in favor of the IC group in multivariate analysis ( p  = 0.029). There was no difference between the groups as regards: surgical complications ( p  = 0.76), time of mobilization ( p  = 0.93), reintervention rate ( p  = 1) and 90-day mortality ( p  = 0.47). Conclusions Our results show that IC anastomosis in LRHC is associated with fewer medical complications and shorter hospital stays compared to EC anastomosis.
ISSN:1123-6337
1128-045X
DOI:10.1007/s10151-020-02202-z