Comparison of proximal and distal corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome

Introduction Evidence for the efficacy of distal corticosteroid injection compared with proximal injection in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is inadequate. Methods We conducted a randomized, double‐blind noninferiority trial of 131 wrists with CTS. Forty milligrams of methylprednisolone was injected m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Muscle & nerve 2020-07, Vol.62 (1), p.89-94
Hauptverfasser: Nair, Pradeep Pankajakshan, Wadwekar, Vaibhav, Chakkalakkoombil, Sunitha Vellathussery, Narayan, Sunil K., Marusani, Revanth, Murgai, Aditya, Thirunavukkarasu, Sibi, Krishnamoorthy, Amritha, Thazhath, Harichandrakumar Kottyen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Evidence for the efficacy of distal corticosteroid injection compared with proximal injection in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is inadequate. Methods We conducted a randomized, double‐blind noninferiority trial of 131 wrists with CTS. Forty milligrams of methylprednisolone was injected medial to the palmaris longus tendon 2 cm proximal to the wrist crease, or at the volar aspect, 2 to 3 cm distal to the wrist crease. Proximal & distal groups received a placebo. The primary outcome was difference in CTS Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) score at 1 month. Secondary outcome measures included the difference in SSS score at 3 months, Functional Status Scale (FSS) score at 1 and 3 months, and pain of injections. Results No significant differences were noted between groups in scores on the SSS and FSS. Pain was lower in the proximal group compared with the distal group. Discussion Corticosteroid injections for CTS distal to the wrist are not inferior to proximal injections, yet they are more painful.
ISSN:0148-639X
1097-4598
DOI:10.1002/mus.26886