Segmental ureterectomy vs. radical nephroureterectomy for ureteral carcinoma in patients with a preoperative glomerular filtration rate less than 90 ml/min/1.73 m2: A multicenter study

•Similar overall survival after segmental ureterectomy and radical nephroureterectomy.•No differences of postoperative decrease of glomerular filtration rate.•Segmental ureterectomy should not be indicated primarily to preserve renal function.•Segmental ureterectomy should be indicated when feasible...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urologic oncology 2020-06, Vol.38 (6), p.601.e11-601.e16
Hauptverfasser: Abrate, Alberto, Sessa, Francesco, Campi, Riccardo, Preto, Mirko, Olivero, Alberto, Varca, Virginia, Benelli, Andrea, Sessa, Maurizio, Sebastianelli, Arcangelo, Pavone, Carlo, Serretta, Vincenzo, Vella, Marco, Brunocilla, Eugenio, Serni, Sergio, Trombetta, Carlo, Terrone, Carlo, Gregori, Andrea, Lissiani, Andrea, Gontero, Paolo, Schiavina, Riccardo, Gacci, Mauro, Simonato, Alchiede
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Similar overall survival after segmental ureterectomy and radical nephroureterectomy.•No differences of postoperative decrease of glomerular filtration rate.•Segmental ureterectomy should not be indicated primarily to preserve renal function.•Segmental ureterectomy should be indicated when feasible and oncologically safe. To compare segmental ureterectomy (SU) and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in terms of overall survival (OS) and impact on postoperative renal function in patients treated for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) of the ureter with preoperatively reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We retrospectively collected the data of consecutive patients treated for UTUC, in 6 Italian tertiary referral centers, from 2003 to 2013, and analyzed those treated with RNU or SU for ureteral cancer and with a preoperative eGFR
ISSN:1078-1439
1873-2496
DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.005