Outcomes of reperfusion therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in patients aged 90 years or older: a retrospective study

The benefits and risks of acute reperfusion therapy (RT) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) remain uncertain in older patients, especially in nonagenarians. We aimed to assess the impact of RT in this population. Single-center retrospective cohort study comparing patients ≥ 90 years old admitted to a S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Internal and emergency medicine 2021, Vol.16 (1), p.101-108
Hauptverfasser: Gomes, Clara, Barcelos, Vanessa, Guiomar, Verónica, Pintalhão, Mariana, Almeida, Jorge, Fonseca, Luísa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The benefits and risks of acute reperfusion therapy (RT) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) remain uncertain in older patients, especially in nonagenarians. We aimed to assess the impact of RT in this population. Single-center retrospective cohort study comparing patients ≥ 90 years old admitted to a Stroke Unit (2008–2018) with AIS, submitted or not to RT [intravenous thrombolysis(IVT), mechanical thrombectomy(MT) or both]. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital complications and 3-month outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was 3-month “favorable outcome”, defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0–2 or equal to pre-stroke. Secondary outcomes were haemorrhagic transformation (HT) and 3 months mortality. We included 167 patients (median age 92 years, 66.5% females); 46.1% underwent RT (59 IVT, 11 MT, 7 both). RT group had higher admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (16 versus 9.5, p  
ISSN:1828-0447
1970-9366
DOI:10.1007/s11739-020-02318-y