Association between myotonometric measurement of masseter muscle stiffness and maximum bite force in healthy elders

Background Maximum bite force (MBF) is a common and useful index of masticatory function; it correlates with physical strength in elderly people. Palpation of stiffness in the masseter muscle during forceful biting has been considered to be associated with MBF. However, this assessment method relies...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral rehabilitation 2020-06, Vol.47 (6), p.750-756
Hauptverfasser: Hara, Koji, Namiki, Chizuru, Yamaguchi, Kohei, Kobayashi, Kenichiro, Saito, Takayuki, Nakagawa, Kazuharu, Ishii, Miki, Okumura, Takuma, Tohara, Haruka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Maximum bite force (MBF) is a common and useful index of masticatory function; it correlates with physical strength in elderly people. Palpation of stiffness in the masseter muscle during forceful biting has been considered to be associated with MBF. However, this assessment method relies on subjective judgments; no study has verified the relationship between MBF and quantitative measurements of masseter muscle stiffness (MMS). Objective We aimed to verify the association between masseter muscle myotonometric assessment results and MBF. Methods In total, 117 community‐dwelling >65‐year‐old individuals from the Tokyo metropolitan area were assessed. MMS on the dominant side during forceful biting was measured with a MyotonPRO device. Masseter muscle thickness (MMT) during rest and forceful biting was measured with an ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus, and the difference in MMT (DMMT) between the rest and forceful biting conditions was determined. MBF data were obtained with a pressure‐sensitive sheet and an associated device. To determine the independent variables affecting MBF and MMS, multivariate linear regression analyses with adjustments for age, sex and number of teeth were performed. Results The multivariate analysis revealed that MBF correlated with the number of teeth (β = .489, P 
ISSN:0305-182X
1365-2842
DOI:10.1111/joor.12968