Outcomes of sinonasal mucosal melanomas with endoscopic and open resection: a retrospective cohort study
Purpose To compare the outcomes of Sinonasal Mucosal Melanomas (SNMM) treated with endoscopic and open resection. Methods A retrospective case review of 20 patients with SNMM treated surgically at UCSF. Kaplan–Meier analyses were calculated to determine outcome differences in endoscopic vs. open res...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neuro-oncology 2020-12, Vol.150 (3), p.387-392 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 392 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 387 |
| container_title | Journal of neuro-oncology |
| container_volume | 150 |
| creator | Almutuawa, Deema M. Strohl, Madeleine P. Gruss, Calvin van Zante, Annemieke Yom, Sue S. McDermott, Michael W. El-Sayed, Ivan H. |
| description | Purpose
To compare the outcomes of Sinonasal Mucosal Melanomas (SNMM) treated with endoscopic and open resection.
Methods
A retrospective case review of 20 patients with SNMM treated surgically at UCSF. Kaplan–Meier analyses were calculated to determine outcome differences in endoscopic vs. open resections.
Results
From 2005 to 2014, 20 cases of SNMM were confirmed and treated at UCSF. All cases underwent surgical resection, with 10 cases by open resection and 10 cases by endoscopic resection. Using Kaplan–Meier analyses, the open resection group had a 1-year survival of 30% whereas endoscopic resection group was 80% (p = 0.032). Endoscopic resection showed improved survival at all time points after surgery compared to open resection.
Conclusion
SNMM is a rare and aggressive tumor that is associated with low survival rates. In this small case series, endoscopic resection had improved survival outcomes compared to open resection. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11060-020-03449-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2384820160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473333169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f2ebecb27554055c6fcc6a0126cd7439c26fcda3ab3d382869c2e2aec48d34123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctKxDAUDaI44-MHXEjAjZtqXm067mTwBQNuFNyFTHrrVKZJzW0V_97MjA9wYSBccnLuSe45hBxxdsYZ0-fIOStYxkTaUqlJxrbImOdaZlpquU3GjBc6yyfqaUT2EF8YY0pLvktGUgihRVmOyeJ-6F1oAWmoKTY-eIt2SdvBhXWFpfWhtUjfm35BwVcBXegaR62vaOjA0wgIrm-Cv6A2HfoYsFsBb0BdWITYU-yH6uOA7NR2iXD4VffJ4_XVw_Q2m93f3E0vZ5mTOu-zWsAc3FzoPFcsz11RO1dYxkXhKq3kxImEVFbauaxkKcoiISAsOFVWUnEh98npRreL4XUA7E3boINlmgPCgEbIUpUiOcMS9eQP9SUM0affGZGMSosXk8QSG5ZLk2GE2nSxaW38MJyZVQ5mk4NJOZh1DmYlffwlPcxbqH5avo1PBLkhYLryzxB_3_5H9hP0k5SB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473333169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of sinonasal mucosal melanomas with endoscopic and open resection: a retrospective cohort study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Almutuawa, Deema M. ; Strohl, Madeleine P. ; Gruss, Calvin ; van Zante, Annemieke ; Yom, Sue S. ; McDermott, Michael W. ; El-Sayed, Ivan H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Almutuawa, Deema M. ; Strohl, Madeleine P. ; Gruss, Calvin ; van Zante, Annemieke ; Yom, Sue S. ; McDermott, Michael W. ; El-Sayed, Ivan H.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To compare the outcomes of Sinonasal Mucosal Melanomas (SNMM) treated with endoscopic and open resection.
Methods
A retrospective case review of 20 patients with SNMM treated surgically at UCSF. Kaplan–Meier analyses were calculated to determine outcome differences in endoscopic vs. open resections.
Results
From 2005 to 2014, 20 cases of SNMM were confirmed and treated at UCSF. All cases underwent surgical resection, with 10 cases by open resection and 10 cases by endoscopic resection. Using Kaplan–Meier analyses, the open resection group had a 1-year survival of 30% whereas endoscopic resection group was 80% (p = 0.032). Endoscopic resection showed improved survival at all time points after surgery compared to open resection.
Conclusion
SNMM is a rare and aggressive tumor that is associated with low survival rates. In this small case series, endoscopic resection had improved survival outcomes compared to open resection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-594X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03449-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32227288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>A Multidisciplinary Approach to Skull-Base Malignancies ; Clinical Study ; Cohort analysis ; Endoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Melanoma ; Mucosa ; Neurology ; Oncology ; Surgery ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020-12, Vol.150 (3), p.387-392</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f2ebecb27554055c6fcc6a0126cd7439c26fcda3ab3d382869c2e2aec48d34123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f2ebecb27554055c6fcc6a0126cd7439c26fcda3ab3d382869c2e2aec48d34123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11060-020-03449-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11060-020-03449-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32227288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Almutuawa, Deema M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strohl, Madeleine P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruss, Calvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Zante, Annemieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yom, Sue S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sayed, Ivan H.</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of sinonasal mucosal melanomas with endoscopic and open resection: a retrospective cohort study</title><title>Journal of neuro-oncology</title><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><description>Purpose
To compare the outcomes of Sinonasal Mucosal Melanomas (SNMM) treated with endoscopic and open resection.
Methods
A retrospective case review of 20 patients with SNMM treated surgically at UCSF. Kaplan–Meier analyses were calculated to determine outcome differences in endoscopic vs. open resections.
Results
From 2005 to 2014, 20 cases of SNMM were confirmed and treated at UCSF. All cases underwent surgical resection, with 10 cases by open resection and 10 cases by endoscopic resection. Using Kaplan–Meier analyses, the open resection group had a 1-year survival of 30% whereas endoscopic resection group was 80% (p = 0.032). Endoscopic resection showed improved survival at all time points after surgery compared to open resection.
Conclusion
SNMM is a rare and aggressive tumor that is associated with low survival rates. In this small case series, endoscopic resection had improved survival outcomes compared to open resection.</description><subject>A Multidisciplinary Approach to Skull-Base Malignancies</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Mucosa</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>0167-594X</issn><issn>1573-7373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctKxDAUDaI44-MHXEjAjZtqXm067mTwBQNuFNyFTHrrVKZJzW0V_97MjA9wYSBccnLuSe45hBxxdsYZ0-fIOStYxkTaUqlJxrbImOdaZlpquU3GjBc6yyfqaUT2EF8YY0pLvktGUgihRVmOyeJ-6F1oAWmoKTY-eIt2SdvBhXWFpfWhtUjfm35BwVcBXegaR62vaOjA0wgIrm-Cv6A2HfoYsFsBb0BdWITYU-yH6uOA7NR2iXD4VffJ4_XVw_Q2m93f3E0vZ5mTOu-zWsAc3FzoPFcsz11RO1dYxkXhKq3kxImEVFbauaxkKcoiISAsOFVWUnEh98npRreL4XUA7E3boINlmgPCgEbIUpUiOcMS9eQP9SUM0affGZGMSosXk8QSG5ZLk2GE2nSxaW38MJyZVQ5mk4NJOZh1DmYlffwlPcxbqH5avo1PBLkhYLryzxB_3_5H9hP0k5SB</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Almutuawa, Deema M.</creator><creator>Strohl, Madeleine P.</creator><creator>Gruss, Calvin</creator><creator>van Zante, Annemieke</creator><creator>Yom, Sue S.</creator><creator>McDermott, Michael W.</creator><creator>El-Sayed, Ivan H.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Outcomes of sinonasal mucosal melanomas with endoscopic and open resection: a retrospective cohort study</title><author>Almutuawa, Deema M. ; Strohl, Madeleine P. ; Gruss, Calvin ; van Zante, Annemieke ; Yom, Sue S. ; McDermott, Michael W. ; El-Sayed, Ivan H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f2ebecb27554055c6fcc6a0126cd7439c26fcda3ab3d382869c2e2aec48d34123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>A Multidisciplinary Approach to Skull-Base Malignancies</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Mucosa</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Almutuawa, Deema M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strohl, Madeleine P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruss, Calvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Zante, Annemieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yom, Sue S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sayed, Ivan H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuro-oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Almutuawa, Deema M.</au><au>Strohl, Madeleine P.</au><au>Gruss, Calvin</au><au>van Zante, Annemieke</au><au>Yom, Sue S.</au><au>McDermott, Michael W.</au><au>El-Sayed, Ivan H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of sinonasal mucosal melanomas with endoscopic and open resection: a retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuro-oncology</jtitle><stitle>J Neurooncol</stitle><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>387-392</pages><issn>0167-594X</issn><eissn>1573-7373</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To compare the outcomes of Sinonasal Mucosal Melanomas (SNMM) treated with endoscopic and open resection.
Methods
A retrospective case review of 20 patients with SNMM treated surgically at UCSF. Kaplan–Meier analyses were calculated to determine outcome differences in endoscopic vs. open resections.
Results
From 2005 to 2014, 20 cases of SNMM were confirmed and treated at UCSF. All cases underwent surgical resection, with 10 cases by open resection and 10 cases by endoscopic resection. Using Kaplan–Meier analyses, the open resection group had a 1-year survival of 30% whereas endoscopic resection group was 80% (p = 0.032). Endoscopic resection showed improved survival at all time points after surgery compared to open resection.
Conclusion
SNMM is a rare and aggressive tumor that is associated with low survival rates. In this small case series, endoscopic resection had improved survival outcomes compared to open resection.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32227288</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11060-020-03449-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-594X |
| ispartof | Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020-12, Vol.150 (3), p.387-392 |
| issn | 0167-594X 1573-7373 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2384820160 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | A Multidisciplinary Approach to Skull-Base Malignancies Clinical Study Cohort analysis Endoscopy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Melanoma Mucosa Neurology Oncology Surgery Survival |
| title | Outcomes of sinonasal mucosal melanomas with endoscopic and open resection: a retrospective cohort study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T11%3A27%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20sinonasal%20mucosal%20melanomas%20with%20endoscopic%20and%20open%20resection:%20a%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuro-oncology&rft.au=Almutuawa,%20Deema%20M.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=387-392&rft.issn=0167-594X&rft.eissn=1573-7373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11060-020-03449-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473333169%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473333169&rft_id=info:pmid/32227288&rfr_iscdi=true |