Outcomes of sinonasal mucosal melanomas with endoscopic and open resection: a retrospective cohort study

Purpose To compare the outcomes of Sinonasal Mucosal Melanomas (SNMM) treated with endoscopic and open resection. Methods A retrospective case review of 20 patients with SNMM treated surgically at UCSF. Kaplan–Meier analyses were calculated to determine outcome differences in endoscopic vs. open res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuro-oncology 2020-12, Vol.150 (3), p.387-392
Hauptverfasser: Almutuawa, Deema M., Strohl, Madeleine P., Gruss, Calvin, van Zante, Annemieke, Yom, Sue S., McDermott, Michael W., El-Sayed, Ivan H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To compare the outcomes of Sinonasal Mucosal Melanomas (SNMM) treated with endoscopic and open resection. Methods A retrospective case review of 20 patients with SNMM treated surgically at UCSF. Kaplan–Meier analyses were calculated to determine outcome differences in endoscopic vs. open resections. Results From 2005 to 2014, 20 cases of SNMM were confirmed and treated at UCSF. All cases underwent surgical resection, with 10 cases by open resection and 10 cases by endoscopic resection. Using Kaplan–Meier analyses, the open resection group had a 1-year survival of 30% whereas endoscopic resection group was 80% (p = 0.032). Endoscopic resection showed improved survival at all time points after surgery compared to open resection. Conclusion SNMM is a rare and aggressive tumor that is associated with low survival rates. In this small case series, endoscopic resection had improved survival outcomes compared to open resection.
ISSN:0167-594X
1573-7373
DOI:10.1007/s11060-020-03449-0