Knowledge of Stroke, Its Warning Symptoms, Risk Factors and Treatment among the General Public and General Practitioners in a South Asian Population

•Over 50% of general public are not aware that the brain is afflicted in stroke.•Over a third of general public are not aware of major stroke risk factors.•Only 1 in 10 general practitioners are aware of the time window for thrombolysis.•Strategies to improve stroke literacy are needed to reduce pop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 2020-05, Vol.29 (5), p.104760-104760, Article 104760
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Thashi, Ibrahim, Shiyana, Ranasinghe, Hasanthika M., Mihirini, A.H.T.M., Weerasinghe, Dinushi, Vithanage, T.D.P., Banagala, Chinthaka, Arambepola, Carukshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Over 50% of general public are not aware that the brain is afflicted in stroke.•Over a third of general public are not aware of major stroke risk factors.•Only 1 in 10 general practitioners are aware of the time window for thrombolysis.•Strategies to improve stroke literacy are needed to reduce population stroke burden.•Stroke awareness should be an integral part of educational programmes. An adequate stroke literacy among the general public and first-contact physicians is an essential prerequisite to ensure timely treatment and prevention of stroke. Knowledge on stroke pathophysiology, warning symptoms, risk factors and treatment, and its determinants was assessed among general public and general practitioners (GPs) in a South Asian population. A cross-sectional study was conducted among relatives of nonstroke patients admitted to the apex tertiary-care hospital in Sri Lanka. Trained doctors administered pretested, structured, open- and close-ended questionnaires. A postal survey using self-administered questionnaires was conducted among all registered GPs in Sri Lanka. The sample of general public (51.7% males; mean age = 40.7 years) from 21 of 25 districts of Sri Lanka was 840 (response-rate = 97.4%) while the sample of GPs (77.6% males; mean age = 59.63 years) was 98 (response-rate = 30%). Of the general public, 83.2% were aware of a vascular aetiology of stroke, but only 46.8% were aware that the affected organ was the brain while 67.5% believed that either the heart or limb muscles die as sequalae of stroke. Over 50% correctly identified stroke warning symptoms while 84.7% would seek immediate Western medical treatment. Approximately, 32%-46% were not aware of the major stroke risk factors. Lower education (adj. OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.3-2.3), absence of stroke risk factors (2.6; 1.9-3.7) and nonutility of information sources (1.5; 1.0-2.0) determined poor knowledge on risk factors. Only about 1 in 8 GPs accurately defined stroke and TIA while only 43.9% correctly classified stroke subtypes. Only 1 in 10 GPs were aware of the recommended therapeutic window for thrombolysis. Older age (P = 0.01) and longer service (P = 0.04) of GPs were associated with not requesting brain imaging in stroke. Strategies to educate both the public and first-contact physicians to improve stroke literacy need to be an integral part of programmes that aim to reduce the burden of stroke in any population.
ISSN:1052-3057
1532-8511
DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104760