Acute radiation-induced skin toxicity in hypofractionated vs. conventional whole-breast irradiation: An objective, randomized multicenter assessment using spectrophotometry
•Randomized study on skin toxicities comparing HF and CF breast irradiation.•The study represents the second randomized trial with homogenous patient characteristics.•Radiation dermatitis rates were significantly lower in patients treated with HF.•Spectrophotometry revealed less erythema and pigment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 2020-05, Vol.146, p.172-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Randomized study on skin toxicities comparing HF and CF breast irradiation.•The study represents the second randomized trial with homogenous patient characteristics.•Radiation dermatitis rates were significantly lower in patients treated with HF.•Spectrophotometry revealed less erythema and pigmentation following HF.•Patients experienced less pain, hyperpigmentation and limitations of activities following HF.
Radiation dermatitis represents one of the most frequent side effects in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Whether hypofractionated WBI induces comparable or less acute radiation-induced skin reactions than conventional WBI is still not fully clarified, as randomized evidence and objective assessments are limited. The aim of this study was to objectively determine frequency and severity of acute radiation-induced skin reactions during hypofractionated vs. conventionally fractionated adjuvant WBI.
In this randomized multicenter study, a total of 140 breast cancer patients underwent either hypofractionated or conventional WBI following breast-preserving surgery. Maximum radiation dermatitis severity was assessed at completion and during follow-up by physician-assessed CTCAE v4.03 and the patient-reported RISRAS scale. Additionally, photospectrometric skin readings were performed to objectify skin color differences between both treatment arms.
Radiation dermatitis severity was significantly lower in patients receiving hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation (mean 1.05 vs. 1.43, p = .024). Grade 0 radiation dermatitis occurred in 21.43% vs. 4.28%, grade ≥2 in 27.14% vs. 42.91% and grade ≥3 in 0% vs. 4.34% of patients following hypofractionated and conventional WBI, respectively. Objective photospectrometric measurements (n = 4200) showed both decreased erythema severity (p = .008) and hyperpigmentation (p = .002) in the hypofractionation arm. Patients allocated to hypofractionated WBI also reported less pain (p = .006), less hyperpigmentation (p = |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-8140 1879-0887 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.018 |