Carbon Fiber–Reinforced PEEK Versus Titanium Tibial Intramedullary Nailing: A Preliminary Analysis and Results
OBJECTIVES:Standard titanium nails (TN) or carbon fiber–reinforced PEEK nails (CFN) were compared to evaluate impact of material on fracture union, healing time, knee/ankle, and barometric pain. DESIGN:Longitudinal cohort evaluated retrospectively comparing 2 periods using 2 implant types. SETTING:S...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2020-08, Vol.34 (8), p.429-433 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVES:Standard titanium nails (TN) or carbon fiber–reinforced PEEK nails (CFN) were compared to evaluate impact of material on fracture union, healing time, knee/ankle, and barometric pain.
DESIGN:Longitudinal cohort evaluated retrospectively comparing 2 periods using 2 implant types.
SETTING:Single surgeon series at one Level II Trauma Center.
PATIENTS:Standardized treatment protocol. Fifty-six tibial fracture patients suitable for intramedullary nailing over 5-year period.
INTERVENTION:First period—TN; second period—CFN.
MAIN OUTCOME:Measurementsstandard demographic dataOTA/AO fracture classification, fracture location, and nail type. Outcome parameterscumulative healing at standard time intervals, infection/nonunion, associated injuries, knee/ankle, barometric pain, and implant removal. Statistical analysis comparing incident healing.
RESULTS:Patient populations were not statistically different regarding demographics and fracture type/location, although there was a trend toward greater fracture severity/more associated injuries in CFN group. In 56 patients, 26 received CFN and 30 received TN. Healing rates were reported at each time interval. 8 weeksTN—0%, CFN—19%; 12 weeksTN—17%, CFN—69%; 16 weeksTN—57%, CFN—92%; 20 weeksTN—87%, CFN—96%; and 24 weeksTN—97%, CFN—96% (P < 0.0001 every interval except 24 weeks). Each group had one infected nonunion in an open fracture that healed with subsequent treatment. There was a trend toward less barometric pain with CFN that did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.065). No statistical differences with knee/ankle pain (P = 0.109)/removal of implant (P = 0.269) potentially due to low power of pilot study.
CONCLUSIONS:In this pilot study evaluating CFR-PEEK intramedullary nail for tibial shaft fractures, there was a demonstrated accelerated healing times compared to titanium with a potential for less barometric pain.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0890-5339 1531-2291 |
DOI: | 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001756 |