Integrated genomic characterization of ERBB2/HER2 alterations in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on unusual FISH groups
In patients with invasive breast cancer, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for HER2 typically demonstrates the clear presence or lack of ERBB2 ( HER2 ) amplification (i.e., groups 1 or 5). However, a small subset of patients can present with unusual HER2 FISH patterns (groups 2–4), r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Modern pathology 2020-08, Vol.33 (8), p.1546-1556 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In patients with invasive breast cancer, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for HER2 typically demonstrates the clear presence or lack of
ERBB2
(
HER2
) amplification (i.e., groups 1 or 5). However, a small subset of patients can present with unusual
HER2
FISH patterns (groups 2–4), resulting in diagnostic confusion. To provide clarity, the 2018 CAP/ASCO HER2 testing guideline recommends additional testing using HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for determining the final HER2 status. Despite this effort, the genomic correlates of unusual
HER2
FISH groups remain poorly understood. Here, we used droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to characterize the genomic features of both usual and unusual
HER2
FISH groups. In this study, 51 clinical samples were selected to represent FISH groups 1–5. Furthermore, group 1 was subdivided into two groups, with groups 1A and 1B corresponding to cases with
HER2
signals/cell ≥6.0 and 4–6, respectively. Overall, our findings revealed a wide range of copy number alterations in
HER2
across the different FISH groups. As expected, groups 1A and 5 showed the clear presence and lack of
HER2
copy number gain, respectively, as measured by ddPCR and NGS. In contrast, group 1B and other uncommon FISH groups (groups 2–4) were characterized by a broader range of
HER2
copy levels with only a few select cases showing high-level gain. Notably, these cases with increased
HER2
copy levels also showed HER2 overexpression by IHC, thus highlighting the correlation between
HER2
copy number and HER2 protein expression. Given the concordance between the genomic and protein results, our findings suggest that HER2 IHC may inform
HER2
copy number status in patients with unusual FISH patterns. Hence, our results support the current recommendation for using IHC to resolve HER2 status in FISH groups 2–4. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0893-3952 1530-0285 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41379-020-0504-5 |