Impact of Endoscopists’ Personality Traits on Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy: A KASID Multicenter Study

Background The personality traits of endoscopists have been suggested to affect the adenoma detection rate (ADR). We thus evaluated the relationship between endoscopists’ personality traits and the ADR during colonoscopy using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Methods In to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive diseases and sciences 2020-08, Vol.65 (8), p.2302-2310
Hauptverfasser: Jung, Yunho, Cha, Jae Myung, Lee, Na-Hyun, Joo, Young-Eun, Lee, Yoo Jin, Kim, Hyun Gun, Jeon, Seong Ran, Shin, Jeong Eun, Yang, Hyo-Joon, Lee, Jun, Kim, Kyeong Ok, Kim, Jong Wook, Na, Soo-Young, Boo, Sun-Jin, Kim, Jae Hyun, Han, Mee Jung, Hwangbo, Young, Huh, Kyu Chan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The personality traits of endoscopists have been suggested to affect the adenoma detection rate (ADR). We thus evaluated the relationship between endoscopists’ personality traits and the ADR during colonoscopy using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Methods In total, 1230 patients (asymptomatic and aged 50–80 years) who underwent screening or surveillance (≥ 5 years) colonoscopy were recruited from 13 university hospitals by 20 endoscopists between September 2015 and December 2017. We retrospectively measured the ADR, polyp detection rate (PDR), and number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC). All 20 endoscopists completed all 567 true/false MMPI-2 items. Results The overall mean colonoscopy withdrawal time, PDR, ADR, and APC were 7.3 ± 2.8 min, 55%, 45.3%, and 0.97 ± 1.58, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the MMPI-2 clinical scales (e.g., hypochondriasis and psychasthenia), content scales (e.g., obsessiveness and type A character), or supplementary scales (e.g., dominance and social responsibility) between the high ADR group (ADR ≥45%, n  = 10) and the low ADR group (ADR 
ISSN:0163-2116
1573-2568
DOI:10.1007/s10620-020-06158-w