A Deep Learning Approach for Automated Sleep-Wake Scoring in Pre-Clinical Animal Models
•Manual scoring of sleep-wake states from EEG and other recordings in animals is time consuming.•We developed two machine learning algorithms for automated sleep-wake scoring in different species.•A Convolutional Neural Network algorithm performed best for scoring sleep-wake states in non-human prim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neuroscience methods 2020-05, Vol.337, p.108668-108668, Article 108668 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Manual scoring of sleep-wake states from EEG and other recordings in animals is time consuming.•We developed two machine learning algorithms for automated sleep-wake scoring in different species.•A Convolutional Neural Network algorithm performed best for scoring sleep-wake states in non-human primates and dogs.•A Random Forest algorithm performed best for scoring sleep-wake states in mice and rats.
Experimental investigation of sleep-wake dynamics in animals is an important part of pharmaceutical development. Typically, it involves recording of electroencephalogram, electromyogram, locomotor activity, and electrooculogram. Visual identification, or scoring, of the sleep-wake states from these recordings is time-consuming. We sought to develop software for automated sleep-wake scoring capable of processing large databases of multi-channel signal recordings in a range of species.
We used a large historical database of signal recordings and scores in non-human primates, dogs, mice, and rats, to develop a deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) classification algorithm for automatically scoring sleep-wake states. We compared the performance of the CNN algorithm with that of a widely used Machine Learning algorithm, Random Forest (RF).
CNN accuracy in sleep-wake scoring of data in non-human primates and dogs was significantly higher than RF accuracy (0.75 vs. 0.66 for non-human primates and 0.73 vs. 0.64 for dogs). In rodents, the difference between CNN and RF was smaller: 0.83 vs. 0.81 for mice and 0.78 vs. 0.77 for rats. The variability of CNN accuracy was lower than that of RF for non-human primates, dogs and mice but similar for rats.
Deep Learning algorithms have not been previously evaluated across a range of species for animal sleep-wake scoring.
We recommend use of CNN for sleep-wake scoring in non-human primates and dogs, and RF for sleep-wake scoring in rodents. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-0270 1872-678X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108668 |