Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Hypertensive Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose of Review The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the effects of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on blood pressure of hypertensive individuals. Recent Findings Continuous aerobic training programs are successful in health prom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Current hypertension reports 2020-03, Vol.22 (3), p.26-26, Article 26
Hauptverfasser:	Leal, Juliana Moraes, Galliano, Leony Morgana, Del Vecchio, Fabrício Boscolo
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Aerobics Blood pressure Cardiology Clinical trials Clinical Trials/Meta-Analysis (WJ Kostis Exercise Family Medicine Fitness training programs General Practice Guidelines Health promotion Hypertension Internal Medicine Interval training Intervention Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meta-analysis Metabolic Diseases Mortality Nephrology Physical fitness Primary Care Medicine Risk factors Section Editor Standard deviation Studies Systematic review Topical Collection on Guidelines/Clinical Trials/Meta-Analysis
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Purpose of Review The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the effects of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on blood pressure of hypertensive individuals. Recent Findings Continuous aerobic training programs are successful in health promotion and are effective in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) modulation. However, HIIT seems to be superior to MICT to improvement of cardiorespiratory fitness. Summary PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized clinical trials that compared chronic effects of HIIT and MICT on BP in hypertensive subjects. Pre- and post-intervention changes in maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2 max) between MICT and HIIT were analyzed. Both interventions presented significant differences in SBP (MICT: mean difference (MD), 3.7 mmHg [95% CI = 2.57, 4.82], p
ISSN:	1522-6417 1534-3111
DOI:	10.1007/s11906-020-1030-z