Impact of resection margins for colorectal liver metastases in laparoscopic and open liver resection: a propensity score analysis

Background There is no clear consensus over the optimal width of resection margin for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), with evolving definitions alongside the advances on the management of the disease. In addition, data on the impact of resection margin after laparoscopic liver resection are stil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2021-02, Vol.35 (2), p.809-818
Hauptverfasser: Martínez-Cecilia, David, Wicherts, Dennis A., Cipriani, Federica, Berardi, Giammauro, Barkhatov, Leonid, Lainas, Panagiotis, D’Hondt, Mathieu, Rotellar, Fernando, Dagher, Ibrahim, Aldrighetti, Luca, Troisi, Roberto I., Edwin, Bjorn, Abu Hilal, Mohammad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background There is no clear consensus over the optimal width of resection margin for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), with evolving definitions alongside the advances on the management of the disease. In addition, data on the impact of resection margin after laparoscopic liver resection are still scarce. Methods Prospectively maintained databases of patients undergoing open or laparoscopic CRLM resection in 7 European tertiary hepatobiliary referral centres were reviewed. After propensity score matching (PSM), the influence of 1 mm and wider margins on OS and DFS were evaluated in open and laparoscopic cohorts. Results After PSM, 648 patients were comparable in each group. The incidence of positive margins (
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07452-4