Impact of resection margins for colorectal liver metastases in laparoscopic and open liver resection: a propensity score analysis
Background There is no clear consensus over the optimal width of resection margin for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), with evolving definitions alongside the advances on the management of the disease. In addition, data on the impact of resection margin after laparoscopic liver resection are stil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2021-02, Vol.35 (2), p.809-818 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
There is no clear consensus over the optimal width of resection margin for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), with evolving definitions alongside the advances on the management of the disease. In addition, data on the impact of resection margin after laparoscopic liver resection are still scarce.
Methods
Prospectively maintained databases of patients undergoing open or laparoscopic CRLM resection in 7 European tertiary hepatobiliary referral centres were reviewed. After propensity score matching (PSM), the influence of 1 mm and wider margins on OS and DFS were evaluated in open and laparoscopic cohorts.
Results
After PSM, 648 patients were comparable in each group. The incidence of positive margins ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-020-07452-4 |