Caveat Predator?: The Justice Dept. is cracking down on predatory pricing

In Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (1993), the Supreme Court concluded that aggressive cost-cutting usually helps consumers and emphatically rejected a claim that B&W had broken the law by selling below-cost generic cigarettes. In so doing, the high court set lofty lega...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bloomberg businessweek (Online) 2000-05 (3682), p.116
1. Verfasser: Dan Carney in Washington, with Wendy Zellner in Dallas
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (1993), the Supreme Court concluded that aggressive cost-cutting usually helps consumers and emphatically rejected a claim that B&W had broken the law by selling below-cost generic cigarettes. In so doing, the high court set lofty legal standards for proving any predatory pricing claims. But Justice antitrust chief Joel I. Klein has some experience scaling heights. If he succeeds, some major airlines could face similar suits - a development that would go a long way toward breaking their tight grip on many of the country's key airports and cutting skyrocketing fares.
ISSN:0007-7135
2162-657X