Perampanel in chronic insomnia

•We describe the first study that evaluates perampanel in chronic insomnia.•88 % patients improved with perampanel and other anxiolytic or antidepressant.•Only 35 % patients improved in non-exposed group.•Perampanel improves insomnia probably due to an antagonistic action on glutamate. Insomnia is t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2020-05, Vol.192, p.105724-105724, Article 105724
Hauptverfasser: Abenza-Abildúa, M.J., Suárez-Gisbert, E., Thuissard-Vasallo, I.J., Andreu-Vazquez, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We describe the first study that evaluates perampanel in chronic insomnia.•88 % patients improved with perampanel and other anxiolytic or antidepressant.•Only 35 % patients improved in non-exposed group.•Perampanel improves insomnia probably due to an antagonistic action on glutamate. Insomnia is the most prevalent sleep disorder in the general population, and one of the most frequent reasons for consultation in the Sleep Units. Perampanel is an antiepileptic also effective on the structure of sleep, and in restless legs syndrome. We describe the first study that evaluates perampanel in patients with chronic insomnia. Observational retrospective cohorts study of 66 patients with chronic resistant insomnia, 33 exposed to perampanel, other 33 as non-exposed group. All patients attended in Neurology or Psychiatry Consultation, from November 2017 to November 2018. Patients included had been treated with more than 4 different drugs in the previous 4 years. We reviewed age, sex, insomnia etiology, years of evolution, number of previously used drugs, and the results of perampanel for insomnia after 3 months of treatment in the exposed cohort, measured by the improvement of 3 or more points in the ISI and Pittsburgh scales, as well as the average of hours of sleep gained. Non-exposed patients were matched with this variables, but never treated with perampanel. We have included 66 patients. In the exposed cohort: we describe 33 patients with chronic resistant insomnia, 20 women (60 %), 13 men (40 %). Average age 53.48 years, average time of evolution: 11.25 years. Main etiology: depression 13 cases (40 %). After the combination of perampanel 2–4 mg (100 %) with antidepressants (17 cases, 51.5 %) or anxiolytics (12 cases, 36.36 %) along 3 months: the total number of hours of sleep improves in 2.5 h, the scale ISI improves by 6 points (± 2.1 SD, p = 0.02), and Pittsburgh scale improves in 4 points (± 1.7, p = 0.04). In non-exposed cohort, the improvement of the ISI scale was 2.2 points (±0.8, p = 0.06), on the Pittsburgh scale was 1.6 points (± 0.5, p = 0.01). The main adverse effect was irritability in 3 patients, without withdrawal perampanel. The treatment was abandoned by 4 patients (12.12%): 1 due to persistent irritability (3%), 2 due to lack of efficacy (6 %), 1 due to pregnancy wish (3 %). The combination of Perampanel with an antidepressant, or an anxiolytic, improves the quality of sleep measured by ISI and Pittsburgh scales (statistically significant), pr
ISSN:0303-8467
1872-6968
DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105724