Emphasizing one leg facilitates single‐leg training using standard cycling equipment

Purpose Single‐leg cycling exercise is one of the most potent, but underutilized, stimuli for promoting peripheral muscle respiratory capacity. Special ergometers used to facilitate single‐leg cycling, while maintaining biomechanics similar to double‐leg cycling, are not widely available. This lack...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2020-06, Vol.30 (6), p.1017-1023
Hauptverfasser: Staples, Trevor J., Do‐Duc, Andréa‐Anh, Link, Jenna E., Martin, James C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Single‐leg cycling exercise is one of the most potent, but underutilized, stimuli for promoting peripheral muscle respiratory capacity. Special ergometers used to facilitate single‐leg cycling, while maintaining biomechanics similar to double‐leg cycling, are not widely available. This lack of availability of specialized ergometers may explain why single‐leg cycling has not been widely implemented as standard clinical practice. Therefore, we explored the extent to which participants could emphasize one leg and de‐emphasize the other to perform “single‐leg emphasis cycling” using standard cycle ergometers. Methods Sixteen athletic participants performed single‐leg emphasis cycling, emphasizing each leg in separate trials, and double‐leg cycling. Pedal forces and limb kinematics were collected and used to calculate joint‐specific work and power at the ankle, knee, and hip. Results Study participants were able to produce approximately three times as much power with their emphasized leg compared to the de‐emphasized leg during single‐leg emphasis cycling. Ankle plantar flexion, dorsiflexion, knee extension, and hip extension work produced during single‐leg emphasis cycling did not differ from those during double‐leg cycling (all P > .60). Hip and knee flexion work during single‐leg emphasis cycling exhibited small but significant differences (both P 
ISSN:0905-7188
1600-0838
DOI:10.1111/sms.13638