Is There a Difference Between Minimal and Gross Extension into the Strap Muscles for the Risk of Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas?

Background: The morbidity of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is primarily related to locoregional recurrences and distant metastases. The definition of minimal extrathyroidal extension (mETE) has been recently revised. The presence of mETE does not impact mortality and is generally not considered to be a predictor for the risk of recurrence. This study aimed at comparing the risk of recurrence and the response to therapy of PTC with mETE and gross extrathyroidal extension (ETE) into the strap muscles (gETE) with low- and intermediate-risk PTC without ETE (low risk w/o ETE and intermediate risk w/o ETE, respectively) to further characterize the impact of ETE on outcomes. Methods: A total of 596 PTCs were analyzed according to the degree of ETE as well as other predictors of recurrence. Four groups of patients were compared, low risk w/o ETE ( n = 251), intermediate risk w/o ETE ( n = 89), mETE ( n = 191), and gETE ( n = 65), to determine the risk of recurrence and the response to treatment. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate associations between groups and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The risk of recurrence was 3% in low risk w/o ETE PTC, 14% in intermediate risk w/o ETE, 14% in mETE, and 25% in gETE. The recurrence risk was increased by the presence of ETE (odds ratio [OR] = 2.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36–5.85, p = 0.005) and lymph node metastases (OR = 2.44 [95% CI 1.25–4.76], p = 0.009). Patients with low-risk carcinomas w/o ETE experienced longer DFS than those with mETE (hazard ratio = 0.08 [95% CI 0.02–0.28], p