Utility of INR For Prediction of Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage Among Warfarin Users with Head Injury

Incidence of delayed intracranial hemorrhage (DICH) in patients on warfarin has been controversial. No previous literature has reported the utility of international normalized ratio (INR) in predicting traumatic DICH. Utilizing INR to risk stratify head trauma patients who may be managed without rep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of emergency medicine 2020-02, Vol.58 (2), p.183-190
Hauptverfasser: Valiuddin, Hisham, Alam, Ariful, Calice, Michael, Boehm, Kevin, Millard, John, Laforest, Daniel, Valiuddin, Yaser, Ricardi, Rick, Kaakaji, Rami, Koch, Spencer, Oweis, Thomas, Keyes, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Incidence of delayed intracranial hemorrhage (DICH) in patients on warfarin has been controversial. No previous literature has reported the utility of international normalized ratio (INR) in predicting traumatic DICH. Utilizing INR to risk stratify head trauma patients who may be managed without repeat imaging. This was a retrospective study at a Level II trauma center. All patients on warfarin with head injuries from March 2014 to December 31, 2017 were included. Each patient underwent an initial head computed tomography scan (HCT) and subsequent repeat HCT 12 h after. Patients presenting > 12 h after head injury received only one HCT. Two blinded neuroradiologists reviewed each case of DICH. Statistical analysis evaluated Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), age, and platelet count. There were 395 patients who qualified for the protocol; 238 were female. Average age was 79 years. Seventy-seven percent of patients underwent repeat HCT. Five resulted in DICH (INR 2.6–3.0), three of which might have been present on initial HCT; incidence rate of 0.51–1.27%. One patient required neurosurgical intervention. Among 80 patients with INR
ISSN:0736-4679
2352-5029
DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.01.003