CT-based deep learning model to differentiate invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as subsolid nodules among surgical candidates: comparison of the diagnostic performance with a size-based logistic model and radiologists

Objectives To evaluate the deep learning models for differentiating invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas (IACs) among subsolid nodules (SSNs) considered for resection in a retrospective diagnostic cohort in comparison with a size-based logistic model and expert radiologists. Methods This study include...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2020-06, Vol.30 (6), p.3295-3305
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Hyungjin, Lee, Dongheon, Cho, Woo Sang, Lee, Jung Chan, Goo, Jin Mo, Kim, Hee Chan, Park, Chang Min
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate the deep learning models for differentiating invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas (IACs) among subsolid nodules (SSNs) considered for resection in a retrospective diagnostic cohort in comparison with a size-based logistic model and expert radiologists. Methods This study included 525 patients (309 women; median, 62 years) to develop models, and an independent cohort of 101 patients (57 women; median, 66 years) was used for validation. A size-based logistic model and deep learning models using 2.5-dimension (2.5D) and three-dimension (3D) CT images were developed to discriminate IAC from less invasive pathologies. Overall performance, discrimination, and calibration were assessed. Diagnostic performances of the three thoracic radiologists were compared with those of the deep learning model. Results The overall performances of the deep learning models (Brier score, 0.122 for the 2.5D DenseNet and 0.121 for the 3D DenseNet) were superior to those of the size-based logistic model (Brier score, 0.198). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the 2.5D DenseNet (0.921) was significantly higher than that of the 3D DenseNet (0.835; p  = 0.037) and the size-based logistic model (0.836; p  = 0.009). At equally high sensitivities of 90%, the 2.5D DenseNet showed significantly higher specificity (88.2%; all p  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-019-06628-4