Engaging From Both Sides: Facilitating a Canadian Two-Generation Prenatal-to-Three Program for Families Experiencing Vulnerability

Background Young children living in families experiencing social vulnerability, including low income, mental illness, addictions, social isolation, and/or homelessness, are at risk of developmental delay. Two-generation programs can improve outcomes for preschool children, but underlying mechanisms and outcomes for younger children remain unclear. Purpose We explored program facilitation and identified developmental benefits of a two-generation program beginning prenatally. Methods In our convergent, concurrent mixed methods study, we interviewed agency staff (n = 10) and held focus groups with parents (n = 14). We compared child (N = 100) development between program intake and exit as measured by the Ages and Stages Questionnaires 3rd edition. Results Our core category, Engaging From Both Sides, included (a) Mitigating Adversity (focused codes Developing Trust, Letting Go of Fear, and Putting in the Effort); (b) Continual Learning (focused codes Staying Connected, and Taking it to the Community); (c) Fostering Families (focused codes Cultivating Optimism, and Happiness and Love); (d) Unravelling Cycles of Crisis (focused codes Advocating, and Helping Parents’ Parent); and (e) Becoming Mainstream (focused codes Knowing Someone Has Your Back, and Managing Stress, Anxiety, and Anger). We found significant improvements in child Fine Motor, Problem-Solving, and Personal-Social domains between program intake and exit. Conclusions Our study adds to existing literature regarding mechanisms of two-generation programs beginning prenatally. Mitigating effects of intergenerational adversity was the primary motivation for interaction and engagement of staff and parents in two-generation programming, which improved child development.