Patient perceptions of participation in emergency medicine research projects

Objective To determine if ED research reflects patient expectations. Method A cross‐sectional ED patient survey. Results Three hundred and nine (98.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 95.7–99.2) of 315 patients believed that ED research was important. Two hundred and twelve (68.4%, 95% CI 62.9–73.5) wo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Emergency medicine Australasia 2020-08, Vol.32 (4), p.570-572
Hauptverfasser: Tonnerre, Erik J, Smith, Jesse L, Spencer, William S, Date, Patrick A, Taylor, David McD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To determine if ED research reflects patient expectations. Method A cross‐sectional ED patient survey. Results Three hundred and nine (98.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 95.7–99.2) of 315 patients believed that ED research was important. Two hundred and twelve (68.4%, 95% CI 62.9–73.5) would welcome involvement, only 26 (8.4%, 95% CI 5.7–12.3) felt pressured to do so. Two hundred and thirty‐one (75.7%, 95% CI 70.5–80.4) and 279 (91.5%, 95% CI 87.6–94.3) believed consent was necessary for observational and experimental studies, respectively. One hundred and one (32.4%, 95% CI 27.3–37.9) disagreed with medical records being accessed without consent. Conclusion Patient expectations are not always consistent with current practice. The expectation of consent prior to record access is worthy of further consideration.
ISSN:1742-6731
1742-6723
DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.13455