How Do ImPACT Quick Test Scores Compare with ImPACT Online Scores in Non-Concussed Adolescent Athletes?

Abstract Objective To compare neurocognitive scores between the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) Quick Test (QT) and Online Versions in non-concussed high school athletes. Methods A sample of 47 high school athletes completed the ImPACT Online Version pre-season an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of clinical neuropsychology 2020-04, Vol.35 (3), p.326-331
Hauptverfasser: Elbin, R J, D’Amico, Nathan R, McCarthy, Matthew, Womble, Melissa N, O’Connor, Sydne, Schatz, Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective To compare neurocognitive scores between the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) Quick Test (QT) and Online Versions in non-concussed high school athletes. Methods A sample of 47 high school athletes completed the ImPACT Online Version pre-season and the ImPACT QT approximately 3 months later. Paired sample t-tests and Pearson’s correlations examined differences and relationships between the ImPACT batteries. Results The ImPACT QT scores were significantly higher for performance on the Three Letters: Average Counted (p 
ISSN:1873-5843
1873-5843
DOI:10.1093/arclin/acz072