How Do ImPACT Quick Test Scores Compare with ImPACT Online Scores in Non-Concussed Adolescent Athletes?
Abstract Objective To compare neurocognitive scores between the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) Quick Test (QT) and Online Versions in non-concussed high school athletes. Methods A sample of 47 high school athletes completed the ImPACT Online Version pre-season an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of clinical neuropsychology 2020-04, Vol.35 (3), p.326-331 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Objective
To compare neurocognitive scores between the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) Quick Test (QT) and Online Versions in non-concussed high school athletes.
Methods
A sample of 47 high school athletes completed the ImPACT Online Version pre-season and the ImPACT QT approximately 3 months later. Paired sample t-tests and Pearson’s correlations examined differences and relationships between the ImPACT batteries.
Results
The ImPACT QT scores were significantly higher for performance on the Three Letters: Average Counted (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-5843 1873-5843 |
DOI: | 10.1093/arclin/acz072 |