The effect of CO2 9.3 μm short-pulsed laser irradiation in enamel erosion reduction with and without fluoride applications—a randomized, controlled in vitro study
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the protective effect of short-pulsed CO 2 9.3 μm laser irradiation against erosion in human enamel without and combined with TiF 4 and AmF/NaF/SnCl 2 applications, respectively, as well as compared to the protective effect of these fluoride treatments...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Lasers in medical science 2020-07, Vol.35 (5), p.1213-1222 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1222 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1213 |
| container_title | Lasers in medical science |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Silva, C. V. Mantilla, T. F. Engel, Y. Tavares, J. P. Freitas, P. M. Rechmann, P. |
| description | The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the protective effect of short-pulsed CO
2
9.3 μm laser irradiation against erosion in human enamel without and combined with TiF
4
and AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
applications, respectively, as well as compared to the protective effect of these fluoride treatments alone. After polishing, ninety enamel samples (3 × 3mm) were used for 9 different treatment groups: 4% TiF
4
gel (pH 1.5, 24,533 ppm F
−
); AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
rinse (pH 4.5; 500 ppm F
−
, 800 ppm Sn
2
); CO
2
laser (average power 0.58 W); CO
2
laser (0.58 W) + TiF
4
; CO
2
laser (0.58 W) + AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
; CO
2
laser (0.69 W); CO
2
laser (0.69 W) + TiF
4
; CO
2
laser (0.69 W) + AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
; negative control (deionized water). TiF
4
gel was brushed on only once before the first erosive cycling, while samples treated with AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
were daily immersed in 5 ml of the solution before cycling. Laser treatment occurred with a CO
2
laser (wavelength 9.3 μm, pulse repetition rate 100 Hz, pulse duration 14.6 μs/18 μs, average power 0.58 W/0.69 W, fluence 1.9 J/cm
2
/2.2 J/cm
2
, beam diameter 0.63 mm, irradiation time 10 s, air cooling). TiF
4
was applied only once, while AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
was applied once daily before the erosive challenge. Surface loss (in μm) was measured with optical profilometry immediately after treatment, and after 5 and 10 days of erosive cycling (0.5% citric acid, pH 2.3, 6 × 2 min/day). Additionally, scanning electron microscopy investigations were performed. All application measures resulted in loss of surface height immediately after treatment. After 5 days, significantly reduced surface loss was observed after applying laser irradiation (both power settings) followed by applications of TiF
4
or AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
solution (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10103-020-02979-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2352633272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2412653206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a6c5601b62fed8d667668a991ae5c5f41efb1e2806311e6d792cea94705c026d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UT1uFDEUtlCQ2CxcgMpSGopM8M-MZ6ZEqyQgrZRmkegsx35mHXnGE9uTKKk4BAdIxSmoOACH4CQ4u0iRUlBYz_b7fp7eh9BbSk4oIe37RAklvCKMlNO3fcVfoAWteVMJUn85QAvCRFd1PaOv0GFKV4TQVlC-QD82W8BgLeiMg8WrC4b7E_7r4ffPAadtiLmaZp_AYK8SROxiVMap7MKI3YhhVAN4DDGkx58IZta73q3LW6xGs7uEOWPr5xCdAaymyTu9U0h_vn1XOBZYGNw9mGOsw5hj8L74FfUbVx445dncvUYvrSpzvPlXl-jz2elm9bFaX5x_Wn1YV5o3LFdK6EYQeimYBdMZIVohOtX3VEGjG1tTsJcUWEcEpxSEaXumQfV1SxpdNmT4Er3b604xXM-Qshxc0uC9GiHMSbJiIzhnLSvQo2fQqzDHsUwnWU2ZaDgrNkvE9ihddpQiWDlFN6h4JymRj9HJfXSyRCd30UleSHxPSgU8foX4JP0f1l8K2aDE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2412653206</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of CO2 9.3 μm short-pulsed laser irradiation in enamel erosion reduction with and without fluoride applications—a randomized, controlled in vitro study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Silva, C. V. ; Mantilla, T. F. ; Engel, Y. ; Tavares, J. P. ; Freitas, P. M. ; Rechmann, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, C. V. ; Mantilla, T. F. ; Engel, Y. ; Tavares, J. P. ; Freitas, P. M. ; Rechmann, P.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the protective effect of short-pulsed CO
2
9.3 μm laser irradiation against erosion in human enamel without and combined with TiF
4
and AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
applications, respectively, as well as compared to the protective effect of these fluoride treatments alone. After polishing, ninety enamel samples (3 × 3mm) were used for 9 different treatment groups: 4% TiF
4
gel (pH 1.5, 24,533 ppm F
−
); AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
rinse (pH 4.5; 500 ppm F
−
, 800 ppm Sn
2
); CO
2
laser (average power 0.58 W); CO
2
laser (0.58 W) + TiF
4
; CO
2
laser (0.58 W) + AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
; CO
2
laser (0.69 W); CO
2
laser (0.69 W) + TiF
4
; CO
2
laser (0.69 W) + AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
; negative control (deionized water). TiF
4
gel was brushed on only once before the first erosive cycling, while samples treated with AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
were daily immersed in 5 ml of the solution before cycling. Laser treatment occurred with a CO
2
laser (wavelength 9.3 μm, pulse repetition rate 100 Hz, pulse duration 14.6 μs/18 μs, average power 0.58 W/0.69 W, fluence 1.9 J/cm
2
/2.2 J/cm
2
, beam diameter 0.63 mm, irradiation time 10 s, air cooling). TiF
4
was applied only once, while AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
was applied once daily before the erosive challenge. Surface loss (in μm) was measured with optical profilometry immediately after treatment, and after 5 and 10 days of erosive cycling (0.5% citric acid, pH 2.3, 6 × 2 min/day). Additionally, scanning electron microscopy investigations were performed. All application measures resulted in loss of surface height immediately after treatment. After 5 days, significantly reduced surface loss was observed after applying laser irradiation (both power settings) followed by applications of TiF
4
or AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
solution (
p
< 0.05; 2-way ANOVA and Tukey test) compared to fluoride application alone. After 10 days, compared to after 5 days, a reduced tissue loss was observed in all groups treated with AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
solution. This tissue gain occurred with the AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
application alone and was significantly higher when the application was combined with the laser use (
p
< 0.05). Short-pulsed CO
2
9.3 μm laser irradiation followed by additional application of AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
solution significantly reduces the progression of dental enamel erosion in vitro.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-8921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-604X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10103-020-02979-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Air cooling ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide lasers ; Citric acid ; Cycles ; Deionization ; Dental enamel ; Dental materials ; Dentistry ; Diameters ; Enamel ; Fluence ; Fluoride treatments ; Fluorides ; Irradiation ; Lasers ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Original Article ; pH effects ; Photonics ; Pulse duration ; Pulse repetition rate ; Pulsed lasers ; Quantum Optics ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Tin chloride ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Lasers in medical science, 2020-07, Vol.35 (5), p.1213-1222</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2020</rights><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a6c5601b62fed8d667668a991ae5c5f41efb1e2806311e6d792cea94705c026d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a6c5601b62fed8d667668a991ae5c5f41efb1e2806311e6d792cea94705c026d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0282-7426</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10103-020-02979-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10103-020-02979-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, C. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantilla, T. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rechmann, P.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of CO2 9.3 μm short-pulsed laser irradiation in enamel erosion reduction with and without fluoride applications—a randomized, controlled in vitro study</title><title>Lasers in medical science</title><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the protective effect of short-pulsed CO
2
9.3 μm laser irradiation against erosion in human enamel without and combined with TiF
4
and AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
applications, respectively, as well as compared to the protective effect of these fluoride treatments alone. After polishing, ninety enamel samples (3 × 3mm) were used for 9 different treatment groups: 4% TiF
4
gel (pH 1.5, 24,533 ppm F
−
); AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
rinse (pH 4.5; 500 ppm F
−
, 800 ppm Sn
2
); CO
2
laser (average power 0.58 W); CO
2
laser (0.58 W) + TiF
4
; CO
2
laser (0.58 W) + AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
; CO
2
laser (0.69 W); CO
2
laser (0.69 W) + TiF
4
; CO
2
laser (0.69 W) + AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
; negative control (deionized water). TiF
4
gel was brushed on only once before the first erosive cycling, while samples treated with AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
were daily immersed in 5 ml of the solution before cycling. Laser treatment occurred with a CO
2
laser (wavelength 9.3 μm, pulse repetition rate 100 Hz, pulse duration 14.6 μs/18 μs, average power 0.58 W/0.69 W, fluence 1.9 J/cm
2
/2.2 J/cm
2
, beam diameter 0.63 mm, irradiation time 10 s, air cooling). TiF
4
was applied only once, while AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
was applied once daily before the erosive challenge. Surface loss (in μm) was measured with optical profilometry immediately after treatment, and after 5 and 10 days of erosive cycling (0.5% citric acid, pH 2.3, 6 × 2 min/day). Additionally, scanning electron microscopy investigations were performed. All application measures resulted in loss of surface height immediately after treatment. After 5 days, significantly reduced surface loss was observed after applying laser irradiation (both power settings) followed by applications of TiF
4
or AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
solution (
p
< 0.05; 2-way ANOVA and Tukey test) compared to fluoride application alone. After 10 days, compared to after 5 days, a reduced tissue loss was observed in all groups treated with AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
solution. This tissue gain occurred with the AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
application alone and was significantly higher when the application was combined with the laser use (
p
< 0.05). Short-pulsed CO
2
9.3 μm laser irradiation followed by additional application of AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
solution significantly reduces the progression of dental enamel erosion in vitro.</description><subject>Air cooling</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide lasers</subject><subject>Citric acid</subject><subject>Cycles</subject><subject>Deionization</subject><subject>Dental enamel</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Fluence</subject><subject>Fluoride treatments</subject><subject>Fluorides</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Pulse duration</subject><subject>Pulse repetition rate</subject><subject>Pulsed lasers</subject><subject>Quantum Optics</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Tin chloride</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0268-8921</issn><issn>1435-604X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UT1uFDEUtlCQ2CxcgMpSGopM8M-MZ6ZEqyQgrZRmkegsx35mHXnGE9uTKKk4BAdIxSmoOACH4CQ4u0iRUlBYz_b7fp7eh9BbSk4oIe37RAklvCKMlNO3fcVfoAWteVMJUn85QAvCRFd1PaOv0GFKV4TQVlC-QD82W8BgLeiMg8WrC4b7E_7r4ffPAadtiLmaZp_AYK8SROxiVMap7MKI3YhhVAN4DDGkx58IZta73q3LW6xGs7uEOWPr5xCdAaymyTu9U0h_vn1XOBZYGNw9mGOsw5hj8L74FfUbVx445dncvUYvrSpzvPlXl-jz2elm9bFaX5x_Wn1YV5o3LFdK6EYQeimYBdMZIVohOtX3VEGjG1tTsJcUWEcEpxSEaXumQfV1SxpdNmT4Er3b604xXM-Qshxc0uC9GiHMSbJiIzhnLSvQo2fQqzDHsUwnWU2ZaDgrNkvE9ihddpQiWDlFN6h4JymRj9HJfXSyRCd30UleSHxPSgU8foX4JP0f1l8K2aDE</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Silva, C. V.</creator><creator>Mantilla, T. F.</creator><creator>Engel, Y.</creator><creator>Tavares, J. P.</creator><creator>Freitas, P. M.</creator><creator>Rechmann, P.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0282-7426</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>The effect of CO2 9.3 μm short-pulsed laser irradiation in enamel erosion reduction with and without fluoride applications—a randomized, controlled in vitro study</title><author>Silva, C. V. ; Mantilla, T. F. ; Engel, Y. ; Tavares, J. P. ; Freitas, P. M. ; Rechmann, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a6c5601b62fed8d667668a991ae5c5f41efb1e2806311e6d792cea94705c026d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air cooling</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide lasers</topic><topic>Citric acid</topic><topic>Cycles</topic><topic>Deionization</topic><topic>Dental enamel</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Fluence</topic><topic>Fluoride treatments</topic><topic>Fluorides</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Pulse duration</topic><topic>Pulse repetition rate</topic><topic>Pulsed lasers</topic><topic>Quantum Optics</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Tin chloride</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, C. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantilla, T. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rechmann, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, C. V.</au><au>Mantilla, T. F.</au><au>Engel, Y.</au><au>Tavares, J. P.</au><au>Freitas, P. M.</au><au>Rechmann, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of CO2 9.3 μm short-pulsed laser irradiation in enamel erosion reduction with and without fluoride applications—a randomized, controlled in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle><stitle>Lasers Med Sci</stitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1213</spage><epage>1222</epage><pages>1213-1222</pages><issn>0268-8921</issn><eissn>1435-604X</eissn><abstract>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the protective effect of short-pulsed CO
2
9.3 μm laser irradiation against erosion in human enamel without and combined with TiF
4
and AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
applications, respectively, as well as compared to the protective effect of these fluoride treatments alone. After polishing, ninety enamel samples (3 × 3mm) were used for 9 different treatment groups: 4% TiF
4
gel (pH 1.5, 24,533 ppm F
−
); AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
rinse (pH 4.5; 500 ppm F
−
, 800 ppm Sn
2
); CO
2
laser (average power 0.58 W); CO
2
laser (0.58 W) + TiF
4
; CO
2
laser (0.58 W) + AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
; CO
2
laser (0.69 W); CO
2
laser (0.69 W) + TiF
4
; CO
2
laser (0.69 W) + AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
; negative control (deionized water). TiF
4
gel was brushed on only once before the first erosive cycling, while samples treated with AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
were daily immersed in 5 ml of the solution before cycling. Laser treatment occurred with a CO
2
laser (wavelength 9.3 μm, pulse repetition rate 100 Hz, pulse duration 14.6 μs/18 μs, average power 0.58 W/0.69 W, fluence 1.9 J/cm
2
/2.2 J/cm
2
, beam diameter 0.63 mm, irradiation time 10 s, air cooling). TiF
4
was applied only once, while AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
was applied once daily before the erosive challenge. Surface loss (in μm) was measured with optical profilometry immediately after treatment, and after 5 and 10 days of erosive cycling (0.5% citric acid, pH 2.3, 6 × 2 min/day). Additionally, scanning electron microscopy investigations were performed. All application measures resulted in loss of surface height immediately after treatment. After 5 days, significantly reduced surface loss was observed after applying laser irradiation (both power settings) followed by applications of TiF
4
or AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
solution (
p
< 0.05; 2-way ANOVA and Tukey test) compared to fluoride application alone. After 10 days, compared to after 5 days, a reduced tissue loss was observed in all groups treated with AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
solution. This tissue gain occurred with the AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
application alone and was significantly higher when the application was combined with the laser use (
p
< 0.05). Short-pulsed CO
2
9.3 μm laser irradiation followed by additional application of AmF/NaF/SnCl
2
solution significantly reduces the progression of dental enamel erosion in vitro.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s10103-020-02979-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0282-7426</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0268-8921 |
| ispartof | Lasers in medical science, 2020-07, Vol.35 (5), p.1213-1222 |
| issn | 0268-8921 1435-604X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2352633272 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Air cooling Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide lasers Citric acid Cycles Deionization Dental enamel Dental materials Dentistry Diameters Enamel Fluence Fluoride treatments Fluorides Irradiation Lasers Medicine Medicine & Public Health Optical Devices Optics Original Article pH effects Photonics Pulse duration Pulse repetition rate Pulsed lasers Quantum Optics Scanning electron microscopy Tin chloride Variance analysis |
| title | The effect of CO2 9.3 μm short-pulsed laser irradiation in enamel erosion reduction with and without fluoride applications—a randomized, controlled in vitro study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A58%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20CO2%209.3%C2%A0%CE%BCm%20short-pulsed%20laser%20irradiation%20in%20enamel%20erosion%20reduction%20with%20and%20without%20fluoride%20applications%E2%80%94a%20randomized,%20controlled%20in%20vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20medical%20science&rft.au=Silva,%20C.%20V.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1213&rft.epage=1222&rft.pages=1213-1222&rft.issn=0268-8921&rft.eissn=1435-604X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10103-020-02979-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2412653206%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2412653206&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |