Implementation of a strategic preoperative surgical meeting to improve the level of care at a high-volume pancreatic center: a before–after analysis of 1000 consecutive cases

The indication, planning, and risk analysis of a pancreatic surgical procedure have recently become increasingly complex. In December 2015, the “Pancreas Round” (PR) meeting was established at our institution to preoperatively review all scheduled cases with a specific focus on surgical indications...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Updates in Surgery 2020-03, Vol.72 (1), p.155-161
Hauptverfasser: Surci, Niccolò, Ramera, Marco, Borin, Alex, Marchegiani, Giovanni, Salvia, Roberto, Bassi, Claudio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The indication, planning, and risk analysis of a pancreatic surgical procedure have recently become increasingly complex. In December 2015, the “Pancreas Round” (PR) meeting was established at our institution to preoperatively review all scheduled cases with a specific focus on surgical indications and technical issues. The present study aims to determine the impact of the PR on the clinical practice in terms of avoiding unrequested laparotomies and anticipating intraoperative pitfalls. A “before–after” study was conducted by retrospectively comparing a pre-intervention period (9/2014–11/2015) to a prospectively assessed post-intervention one (12/2015–3/2017). Outcomes considered were explorative laparotomy (EL) occurrence and a “mismatch” between what was preoperatively expected by the PR and what was intraoperatively found. Of the 1057 patients included in the present study, 531 underwent surgery in the pre- and 526 in the post-intervention period, respectively. The EL rate was comparable between the two periods (15.4% vs. 12.2%, p  = 0.123), despite the significant increase of surgical explorations after neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the post-intervention period (27% vs. 18%, p  
ISSN:2038-131X
2038-3312
DOI:10.1007/s13304-020-00707-8