Fluorescence “Turn On–Off” Sensing of Copper (II) Ions Utilizing Coumarin–Based Chemosensor: Experimental Study, Theoretical Calculation, Mineral and Drinking Water Analysis

Herein, we report the preparation of a fluorescent sensor based on coumarin derivative for copper (II) ion sensing in CH 3 CN/HEPES media. 6,7–dihydroxy–3–(4–(trifluoro)methylphenyl)coumarin ( HMAC ) sensor was fabricated and analyzed by spectroscopic techniques. The sensor demonstrates “turn on–off...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of fluorescence 2020-03, Vol.30 (2), p.317-327
Hauptverfasser: Arslan, Fatma Nur, Geyik, Gonul Akin, Koran, Kenan, Ozen, Furkan, Aydin, Duygu, Elmas, Şükriye Nihan Karuk, Gorgulu, Ahmet Orhan, Yilmaz, Ibrahim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Herein, we report the preparation of a fluorescent sensor based on coumarin derivative for copper (II) ion sensing in CH 3 CN/HEPES media. 6,7–dihydroxy–3–(4–(trifluoro)methylphenyl)coumarin ( HMAC ) sensor was fabricated and analyzed by spectroscopic techniques. The sensor demonstrates “turn on–off” fluorescence quenching in the presence of copper (II) ions at 458 nm. A clear complex between the chemosensor HMAC and copper (II) ions was characterized by ESI–MS as well as the Job’s method. Also, the limit of detection (LOD, 3 σ / k ) value was determined as 24.5 nM in CH 3 CN/HEPES (95/5, v /v) buffer media (pH = 7.0). This value is lower than the admissible level of copper (II) ions in drinking water (maximum 31.5 μM) reported by EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The theoretical calculations (density functional theory, DFT) have been performed for the geometric optimized structures. As a final stage, real sample analyses have successfully been performed by using HMAC , as well as ICP–OES method. The relative standard deviation for copper (II) in mineral and drinking water samples has been determined to be below 0.15% and recovery values are in the range of 95.48–109.20%.
ISSN:1053-0509
1573-4994
DOI:10.1007/s10895-020-02503-4