‘Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective’ response to commentaries
Correspondence to Dr Giulia Cavaliere, Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; g.cavaliere@lancaster.ac.uk Let me begin by thanking the Journal of Medical Ethics editors and the four commentators for taking time to read, reflect and offer thoughtful commen...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical ethics 2020-02, Vol.46 (2), p.91-92 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 92 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 91 |
| container_title | Journal of medical ethics |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Cavaliere, Giulia |
| description | Correspondence to Dr Giulia Cavaliere, Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; g.cavaliere@lancaster.ac.uk Let me begin by thanking the Journal of Medical Ethics editors and the four commentators for taking time to read, reflect and offer thoughtful comments on my paper. Using egg freezing as a case study, Campo-Engelstein argues that ‘medicine is not the best tool to ‘cure’ oppressive power systems’.3 Her perspective follows an important tradition in feminist literature that casts a sceptical gaze towards using technical means to ‘fix’ social problems. Cambridge University Press, 2015. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/medethics-2020-106099 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350898738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2352266495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-bef81562dadbde65392970af255736bc3c5b9679ee2d930f6267ddba26d39f613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFq3DAQhkVpaTZpH6FB0EsOcTuSVrKVWwmbtBBoDu3ZyNK41WJbG0ku5JbHSF4vTxItm26hh9JhYC7f_zMzPyHvGHxgTKiPIzrMP71NFQcOFQMFWr8gC7asRbXksn5JFiBAVaoBOCCHKa2hFG_0a3IgODAJrF6Q_vHu_hJTNtmH6ZSubmYz-HxLzeToRUR0YTyjK5vDD5ww-URNaXodCuStGeg1xrRBm_0vfLx7oBHTJkwJaQ7UhnHEKZvoMb0hr3ozJHz7PI_I94vVt_PP1dXXyy_nn66qbslkrjrsGyYVd8Z1DpUUmusaTM-lrIXqrLCy06rWiNxpAb3iqnauM1w5oXvFxBE52fluYriZy13t6JPFYTAThjm1XEhodFOLpqDv_0LXYY5T2W5Lca7UUstCyR1lY0gpYt9uoh9NvG0ZtNsg2n0Q7TaIdhdE0R0_u89dIfaq358vAOyAblz_tyf7I9kv-2_NE8_wp_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352266495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective’ response to commentaries</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Cavaliere, Giulia</creator><creatorcontrib>Cavaliere, Giulia</creatorcontrib><description>Correspondence to Dr Giulia Cavaliere, Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; g.cavaliere@lancaster.ac.uk Let me begin by thanking the Journal of Medical Ethics editors and the four commentators for taking time to read, reflect and offer thoughtful comments on my paper. Using egg freezing as a case study, Campo-Engelstein argues that ‘medicine is not the best tool to ‘cure’ oppressive power systems’.3 Her perspective follows an important tradition in feminist literature that casts a sceptical gaze towards using technical means to ‘fix’ social problems. Cambridge University Press, 2015.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-6800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106099</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32015017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Bioethics ; Commentary ; Equal rights ; Equality ; Ethics ; Medical ethics ; Politics ; Reproductive technologies ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical ethics, 2020-02, Vol.46 (2), p.91-92</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2020 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-bef81562dadbde65392970af255736bc3c5b9679ee2d930f6267ddba26d39f613</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8703-1499</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32015017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cavaliere, Giulia</creatorcontrib><title>‘Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective’ response to commentaries</title><title>Journal of medical ethics</title><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><description>Correspondence to Dr Giulia Cavaliere, Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; g.cavaliere@lancaster.ac.uk Let me begin by thanking the Journal of Medical Ethics editors and the four commentators for taking time to read, reflect and offer thoughtful comments on my paper. Using egg freezing as a case study, Campo-Engelstein argues that ‘medicine is not the best tool to ‘cure’ oppressive power systems’.3 Her perspective follows an important tradition in feminist literature that casts a sceptical gaze towards using technical means to ‘fix’ social problems. Cambridge University Press, 2015.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Commentary</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0306-6800</issn><issn>1473-4257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFq3DAQhkVpaTZpH6FB0EsOcTuSVrKVWwmbtBBoDu3ZyNK41WJbG0ku5JbHSF4vTxItm26hh9JhYC7f_zMzPyHvGHxgTKiPIzrMP71NFQcOFQMFWr8gC7asRbXksn5JFiBAVaoBOCCHKa2hFG_0a3IgODAJrF6Q_vHu_hJTNtmH6ZSubmYz-HxLzeToRUR0YTyjK5vDD5ww-URNaXodCuStGeg1xrRBm_0vfLx7oBHTJkwJaQ7UhnHEKZvoMb0hr3ozJHz7PI_I94vVt_PP1dXXyy_nn66qbslkrjrsGyYVd8Z1DpUUmusaTM-lrIXqrLCy06rWiNxpAb3iqnauM1w5oXvFxBE52fluYriZy13t6JPFYTAThjm1XEhodFOLpqDv_0LXYY5T2W5Lca7UUstCyR1lY0gpYt9uoh9NvG0ZtNsg2n0Q7TaIdhdE0R0_u89dIfaq358vAOyAblz_tyf7I9kv-2_NE8_wp_M</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Cavaliere, Giulia</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8703-1499</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>‘Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective’ response to commentaries</title><author>Cavaliere, Giulia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-bef81562dadbde65392970af255736bc3c5b9679ee2d930f6267ddba26d39f613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Commentary</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cavaliere, Giulia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cavaliere, Giulia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective’ response to commentaries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Med Ethics</stitle><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>91-92</pages><issn>0306-6800</issn><eissn>1473-4257</eissn><abstract>Correspondence to Dr Giulia Cavaliere, Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; g.cavaliere@lancaster.ac.uk Let me begin by thanking the Journal of Medical Ethics editors and the four commentators for taking time to read, reflect and offer thoughtful comments on my paper. Using egg freezing as a case study, Campo-Engelstein argues that ‘medicine is not the best tool to ‘cure’ oppressive power systems’.3 Her perspective follows an important tradition in feminist literature that casts a sceptical gaze towards using technical means to ‘fix’ social problems. Cambridge University Press, 2015.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</pub><pmid>32015017</pmid><doi>10.1136/medethics-2020-106099</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8703-1499</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0306-6800 |
| ispartof | Journal of medical ethics, 2020-02, Vol.46 (2), p.91-92 |
| issn | 0306-6800 1473-4257 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350898738 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Abortion Bioethics Commentary Equal rights Equality Ethics Medical ethics Politics Reproductive technologies Womens health |
| title | ‘Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective’ response to commentaries |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T13%3A44%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Gestation,%20Equality%20and%20Freedom:%20Ectogenesis%20as%20a%20Political%20Perspective%E2%80%99%20response%20to%20commentaries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20ethics&rft.au=Cavaliere,%20Giulia&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=91-92&rft.issn=0306-6800&rft.eissn=1473-4257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/medethics-2020-106099&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2352266495%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352266495&rft_id=info:pmid/32015017&rfr_iscdi=true |