Characteristics of opioid users undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
Introduction and hypothesis Understanding demographic and opioid utilization patterns of preoperative opioid users compared with opioid-naïve patients undergoing surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) better informs opioid prescribing. Methods A cohort of preoperative opioid users underg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Urogynecology Journal 2020-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1891-1897 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction and hypothesis
Understanding demographic and opioid utilization patterns of preoperative opioid users compared with opioid-naïve patients undergoing surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) better informs opioid prescribing.
Methods
A cohort of preoperative opioid users undergoing surgery for POP from 1 January 2012 through 30 May 2017 was identified. Electronic medical records were utilized to obtain pain scores and prescription data. The cohort was organized by surgical approach, number of concomitant procedures, and patient age. These factors were then matched to pain scores, opioid quantity prescribed at discharge, and subsequent refills. Pain scores and opioid use were evaluated for correlation. Results were then compared with similar data previously published for opioid-naïve patients undergoing surgical treatment of POP.
Results
Preoperative opioid users were younger (55.5 [14.7] vs 59.5 [12.7];
p
= 0.002), of higher body mass index (BMI; 29.2 [5.4] vs 28.6 [10.3];
p
= 0.04), and less likely Caucasian (90.3% vs 95.9%;
p
= 0.002) than opioid-naïve patients. After matching for these differences, opioid users reported higher pain scores (3.5 [2.2] vs 2.6 [1.8];
p
= |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0937-3462 1433-3023 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00192-019-04215-1 |