Distribution of peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultra-wide field fundus imaging in diabetic retinopathy

Purpose To analyze the distribution of diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions in an Indian population using ultra-wide field (UWF) fundus imaging. Methods Seven hundred fifteen subjects (1406 eyes) with diabetic retinopathy in India were enrolled in this multicenter, prospective, observational study usin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2020-04, Vol.258 (4), p.725-733
Hauptverfasser: Verma, Aditya, Alagorie, Ahmed Roshdy, Ramasamy, Kim, van Hemert, Jano, Yadav, NK, Pappuru, Rajeev R, Tufail, Adnan, Nittala, Muneesawar Gupta, Sadda, SriniVas R., Raman, Rajiv
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To analyze the distribution of diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions in an Indian population using ultra-wide field (UWF) fundus imaging. Methods Seven hundred fifteen subjects (1406 eyes) with diabetic retinopathy in India were enrolled in this multicenter, prospective, observational study using UWF pseudocolor imaging with Optos Daytona Plus (Optos plc, Dunfermline, Scotland, UK). Images were transmitted to Doheny Image Reading Center, Los Angeles, CA, for grading. The ETDRS grid was overlaid on stereographic projections of UWF images, and images were graded independently by 2 masked graders. Lesion distribution was graded as predominantly central (PCL) or predominantly peripheral (PPL) according to previous criteria, considering both lesion number and area. An image was graded as PPL if > 50% of the lesion area was seen in at least one peripheral field as compared with the corresponding ETDRS field. Diabetic retinopathy severity was also assessed based on the International Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) grading scale. The main outcome measures were lesion distribution (PPL versus PCL): overall and within specific fields in eyes with various grades of DR. Results Lesion distribution was rated to be PPL in 37% of eyes and PCL in 63% of eyes ( P  
ISSN:0721-832X
1435-702X
DOI:10.1007/s00417-020-04607-w