Early Season Hormonal and Biochemical Changes in Division I Field Hockey Players: Is Fitness Protective?

ABSTRACTWalker, AJ, McFadden, BA, Sanders, DJ, Bozzini, BN, Conway, SP, and Arent, SM. Early season hormonal and biochemical changes in Division I field hockey playersis fitness protective? J Strength Cond Res 34(4)975–981, 2020—The purpose was to evaluate changes in hormonal and biochemical markers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2020-04, Vol.34 (4), p.975-981
Hauptverfasser: Walker, Alan J., McFadden, Bridget A., Sanders, David J., Bozzini, Brittany N., Conway, Sean P., Arent, Shawn M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACTWalker, AJ, McFadden, BA, Sanders, DJ, Bozzini, BN, Conway, SP, and Arent, SM. Early season hormonal and biochemical changes in Division I field hockey playersis fitness protective? J Strength Cond Res 34(4)975–981, 2020—The purpose was to evaluate changes in hormonal and biochemical markers as a result of the accumulated stress of the initial 4-week training block in field hockey players. Womenʼs Division I field hockey players (N = 22; Mage = 19.7 ± 1.1 years) performed testing before the start of preseason (A1) that included body composition (%BF), vertical jump, and V[Combining Dot Above]O2max. Blood draws were conducted at A1 to assess creatine kinase (CK), iron (Fe), hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), percent saturation (%sat), total cortisol (TCORT), free cortisol (FCORT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG), prolactin (PRL), vitamin D (vitD), and thyroxine (T3). Blood draws were repeated 4 weeks later (A2). Athletes were monitored during this training block, which included 2 weeks of preseason and the first 2 weeks of the season, using heart rate monitors to determine energy expenditure (Kcal) and training load. There were significant disruptions in TCORT, FCORT, T3, CK, Fe, and SHBG (p < 0.05) from A1 to A2. V[Combining Dot Above]O2max accounted for 31% (p < 0.05) of the variance in TCORT and %BF accounting for an additional 20.1% (p < 0.05). V[Combining Dot Above]O2max accounted for 32.7% (p < 0.05) of the variance in FCORT. %BF accounted for 48.9% (p < 0.05) of the variance in T3. Kcal was positively correlated with V[Combining Dot Above]O2max (p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with %BF (p < 0.05). Athletes with higher V[Combining Dot Above]O2max and lower %BF may be capable of a higher work output and therefore more likely to experience increased physiological disruptions during intense training. The high-volume nature of preseason and differences in athlete fitness capabilities require coaches to manage players at an individual level to maintain athlete readiness.
ISSN:1064-8011
1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003492