Effects of heat conduction of implant surface at thermal stimulation on implant placement

[Abstract] The purpose of this study is to investigate, in vitro, how two different implant placement methods (one and two-stage implant placement) affect implant surface temperature after thermal stimulation. Two titanium screw implants were used and three thermocouples were attached to the implant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Odontology 2020-07, Vol.108 (3), p.406-414
Hauptverfasser: Ohtaki, Rina, Ueda, Kazuhiko, Watanabe, Fumihiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Abstract] The purpose of this study is to investigate, in vitro, how two different implant placement methods (one and two-stage implant placement) affect implant surface temperature after thermal stimulation. Two titanium screw implants were used and three thermocouples were attached to the implant surface at 0.5 mm (ch1), 5.5 mm (ch2) and 9.0 mm (ch3) under each platform. Experimental devices were fabricated pouring polymerization resin under a condition that imitated the two embedded technique with the one-stage implant placement model (1-stage) and the two-stage implant placement model (2-stage). A hot water storage device was installed in each model and hot water at three temperatures (60℃, 70℃ and 100℃) was flowed. The temperature change over time at the implant surface by the thermocouple was recorded. From the measurement data, the maximum temperature (Max-temp) at the implant surface, the time to reach 47℃ (47℃ r-time), and the duration of 47℃ or more (47℃ c-time) were calculated, and the test was repeated 26 times using the same method. The mean of repeated measurements was determined and statistical analysis was performed. Max-temp showed significant differences between each implant placement method, each channel and each thermal stimulation (p
ISSN:1618-1247
1618-1255
DOI:10.1007/s10266-020-00482-3